MAIN CONFERENCE HALL


F12 No Glass Ceilings (Party Positioning and Tactics Paper)


14.45 Party Business

Chair:
Liz Barker (Chair, Federal Conference Committee)
Aide:
Mark Pack

F12 No Glass Ceilings (Party Positioning and Tactics Paper)

Submitted by:
Federal Executive
Mover:
Val Cox - North Cornwall - Speech
Summation:
Lembit Öpik MP - Montgomery

Conference welcomes the Party positioning and tactics paper, 'No Glass Ceilings'.

Conference notes:

a) The success of our strategy in the last Parliament which resulted in the election of more Liberal Democrat than Conservative Councillors, the breakthrough into the European Parliament and the election of 46 Liberal Democrat Members of Parliament; our strategic positioning was confirmed by the 1995 Federal Conference in Glasgow.

b) The Party's success during this Parliament in obtaining long-standing Liberal Democrat objectives such as the creation of a Scottish Parliament and a Welsh Assembly, PR for these elections and for the European Parliament, the establishment of the Electoral Commission on an alternative proportional system for Westminster elections, the incorporation of the European Convention on Human Rights into British law and progress on legislation for Freedom of Information.

c) That the Liberal Democrats have become the only effective opposition in Parliament campaigning for better provision of public services such as education and health and a welfare system that protects the poor.

d) The success of the Liberal Democrat MPs in pursuing this strategy of 'constructive opposition' in Parliament, and the centrality of this strategy to the achievements outlined above.

Conference resolves:

1 To continue this strategy based upon the Party's independence and distinctiveness, being prepared to work with others at local and national level where we agree and to oppose where we disagree.

2 To commit the Party to campaigning vigorously to bring an end to the undemocratic First Past the Post system of voting and replace it with a proportional system, preferably the Single Transferable Vote.

Conference reaffirms the constitutional procedures by which any changes in strategy require consultation with the Party membership and the agreement of the Parliamentary Party and the Federal Conference.

Amendment 1

Camberwell and Peckham

Mover: Donnachadh McCarthy
Summation: Conrad Russell

Add after line 22 and renumber existing para 2:

2 That one of our important aims is to complete the task begun in May 1997, of the Liberal Democrats replacing the discredited, reactionary Conservative Party as the official Opposition,
as a step to the strategic goal of a genuinely liberal and radical Liberal Democrat government.

3 That any expansion of the subjects covered by the joint Cabinet Committee will only be carried out after a genuine consultation with the Party and the express consent of the Parliamentary Party.

4 That we will seek to involve those from all other parties who support constitutional reform and a more liberal and democratic Europe in the current constitutional reform process.


Amendment 2

Burnley
Mover: Gordon Lishman

Delete Lines 26-28 and insert:

Conference notes the absence of specific constitutional provisions which clearly define the Party's approach to gaining positive consent to proposals for an important change in strategy or positioning;

Conference agrees that:

(i) in the event of any substantial proposal which could affect the Party's independence of political action, the consent will be required of a majority of members of the Parliamentary Party in the House of Commons and the Federal Executive; and,
(ii) unless there is a three-quarters majority of each group in favour of the proposals, the consent of the majority of those present and voting at a Special Conference convened under clause 6.6 of the Constitution; and,
(iii) unless there is a two-thirds majority of those present and voting at that Conference in favour of the proposals, the consent of a majority of all members of the Party voting in the ballot called pursuant to clause 6.11 or 8.6 of the Constitution.

Mover of motion: 20 minutes; other speakers: 4 minutes.

In addition to speeches from the platform, it will be possible for conference representatives to make concise (maximum one minute) interventions from the floor during the debate on the motion. The chair will explain the procedure for making interventions at the beginning of the session.

Speakers

Val Cox - North Cornwall
Donnachadh McCarthy - Camberwell and Peckham
Gordon Lishman - Burnley
Roger Roberts - Conwy
Andrew Duff - Cambridge
Paula Yates - North Dorset
Brian Niblett - Newbury
Cllr Iain Smith - North East Fife
Cllr Sarah Ludford - Islington
Elizabeth Clark - Brent
Shirley Williams (Baroness) - North East Hertfordshire
Cllr John Smithson - Huddersfield
Peter Black - Swansea and Gower
Cllr Richard Kemp - Liverpool Wavertree
Chris White (M) - Hitchin and Harpenden
Cllr David Osborne - Birmingham Yardley & Hodge Hill
Conrad Russell (Earl Russell) - Brent
Cllr David Howarth - Cambridge
Lembit Öpik MP

Interventions

First group
Raymond le Goy Canterbury
David Terry Mid-Worcestershire
Ruth Berry LDYS
Kevin Mulloy Nottingham East
Charles Anglin Vauxhall
Peter Knowlson Mole Valley
Sonia Whitaker Beckenham

Second Group
John Bridges Manchester Gorton
Colin Dormer Hatstings and Rye
Alan Leaman Mid-Dorset and Poole
Cllr Mike Flynn Macclesfield
Gareth Epps Witney
William Parker Brighton Pavilion
Sal Jarvis North East Hertfordshire
William Beard Wolverhampton South West

Vote

Seperate Vote: The word "preferably" in line 24 - Retained
Seperate Vote: The Clause 2 in Amendment 1 - Retained
Amendment 1: Carried
Amendment 2: Carried
Substantive: Carried


Return to Liberal Democrat Conference, Main Hall