|
Spammers Frittered – by AOL!
It’s beginning to look as though the courts
may be the best place to fight back on Spam – here’s mud in their
eyes.
So what, exactly, is Spam? The official title
for this execrable form of “communication” is Unsolicited Commercial
E-mail – or UCE. More often than not, though, it takes the form of a
decidedly dodgy invitation to journey to a porn site, or,
alternatively, purchase Viagra, get your boobs enhanced or have your
appendage lengthened.
You may also be offered what look like dodgy
mortgages (available only to US residents, which only goes to show
the brain power of the individuals that send it to us in the UK) or
perhaps be offered a route into questionable pyramid selling
schemes.
None of this, of course, is anything you really want
to have finding its way into your mailbox.
Over the years, AOL has taken a dim view of Spamming
and Spam – all too often Spammers have found ways of making it look
as though the email they’ve sent you has originated from an AOL
address. I suppose being one of the biggest (if not the
biggest) ISPs in the world makes it that much bigger a target.
Of course, being the dimbulbs they are, Spammers
don’t connect the “biggest” with having mucho clout when it comes to
the hiring of legal types. And thus it is that AOL has hauled a
Spamming organisation through the courts.
The full story is chronicled
here so I won’t go into all the details, but it is a significant
event for the world at large, as far as email is concerned, anyway.
Perhaps, just perhaps, it will be a shot across the
bows of Spammers everywhere. Maybe they’ll think twice before they
squirt gazillions of pointless emails out onto the Internet, and,
more especially, into AOL mailboxes – that’s yours and mine, of
course!
Or not
Or maybe not. The problem is, you see, that the
Spammers can make substantial amounts of money from their nefarious
activities. Even with terrible conversion rates – that’s the number
of people responding to a Spam by actually making a purchase for
every hundred (or thousand) Spams sent – the sheer numbers of emails
they send can mean that lots of folks actually do part with
their hard-earned cash.
Worse yet, some spammers have taken on board a
pseudo-legitimate way of bombarding you with their unwanted dross.
If you sign up to an emailed newsletter, for instance, the
progenitors quite often decide to send you another missive,
including in it a paragraph something along the lines of:
“Because you have signed up to one of our
opt-in email services and are a registered user of our site, we
thought you’d like to receive this fantastic offer”
To my mind, this kind of thing is just not on. Some
e-commerce sites do similar things – if you’ve bought from them,
they take that as an automatic right to send you an email as and
when they see fit. And since you have to give a valid email address
(because you often need to confirm a purchase with them) they
know where to get to you.
Ok, they’ll say that it’s not really Spam, and that
they’re only doing what Maplin and various other stores do when they
take your address as you buy something. The thing is, I have not
solicited email from them – therefore, their commercial emails are
unsolicited – they’re Spam!
In the final analysis, I really do hope that
AOL’s success in the courts will pay off in the long run. And this
isn’t just a sycophantic, brown-nosing job, either. I’ve long hated
Spam, and I’m more than happy to praise any organisation that takes
positive steps to eradicate it. Well done AOL.
^top
Have your say - click here
David Dorn
|