Last update: 22 March 2006
Note: despite resemblances to certain personal names, "Alexa" is pronounced ["a.le.xa], not [{."lEk.s{]!

The image above shows the sixty-four letterforms which comprise the script. Individual letters are referred to by their row and column, thus the backwards alpha is number 61. 75 76 77 78 were the original forms of 25 55 38 48, and 74 and its rotated counterpart (not shown) were the original forms of 17 67.
In its original incarnation, and disregarding the orthographical variations, the script consisted of the letters in rows 1 through 6. Those in rows 1 2 3 were used to write from left to right, and those in rows 6 5 4 from right to left; any given piece of Alexa writing was thus, except for letters 38 48, rotationally symmetrical. The original letterforms were all the same height, and all stood on the baseline with no descenders.
The phonemes represented by the letters when writing the Alexa language can be established with some confidence. Note that the principal distinction in the stops was one of aspiration, not of voicing.
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rows 1 and 6 | i | 1 | u | o | e | a | a | t_h |
| Rows 2 and 5 | p | t | c | c_h | t_h | p_h | k | k_h |
| Rows 3 and 4 | x | C | s | f | m | n | r | l |
It is sometimes suggested that 16 18 formerly represented independent phonemes now lost; they later came to be mere variants of 17 25. The same, of course, is true of 66 68 and 67 55.
Six of the now unused letters in rows 4 to 6 were appropriated for specific Rachovian consonants. The voiced fricatives /v z Z G/ were represented by 42 41 44 43 respectively, where the inverting of the double loop was associated with voicing. /ts/ was represented by 47, probably because of its visual likeness to 18; and 65 was used for /dz/.
The letters in row 8 were created to represent clusters of /s z/ and a stop or affricate: 81 82 83 84 for /StS sts sk st/, and 85 86 87 88 for /ZdZ zdz zg zd/.
Oral /i 1 u e/, long or short, were straightforwardly represented by 11 12 13 15; 17 was used for long /a/ and 14 for short /a/ (later /o/). The nasal vowels /e~ a~/ were written with 15 17 with a semicircle (derived from 36 for /n/) above.
As well as for /i/, 11 indicated both consonantal /j/ and a preceding soft consonant before /a o u/. The combinations of 11 and 13 14 17 were later combined to give the new letters 72 71 73. 13 was originally similarly used to represent /v/ from older /w/, but became restricted to /u/ when 42 became available.
The vowel letters thus formed two groups, one (12 13 14 17 for /1 u o a/) which always followed hard consonants and one (11 15 71 72 73 for /i e jo ju ja/) for use after soft consonants. A combination like 18 + 13 thus represented /tu/, while 18 + 71 represented /t_ju/.

The resonants were more problematic, since they had both lenited and unlenited variants. The most favoured solution was to represent the lenited resonants /v~ z~ l 4/ with simple 35 36 38 37, and to double the letter to represent the unlenited resonants. /N/, which was always unlented, was represented by 45.
Broad and slender consonants were distinguished by the following vowel letter, in a manner similar to Rachovian. There was no systematic way of indicating the consonantal mutations.
Regardless of length, /i 1 u a/ and /jo ju/ were straightforwardly represented as in Rachovian by 11 12 13 17 and 71 72. Short /e o/ were written with 15 14, and /æ/ variously with 15 and 73 reflecting its origins in older /e/ and /ja/.
The transcription of /e: o:/ and /E: O:/ presented particular difficulties. Some scribes wrote /e: o:/ with 15 14 and used digraphs 15+17 and 14+17 (i.e. /ea oa/) for /E: O:/; others used 15 14 for /E: O:/ and wrote /e: o:/ with 15+11 and 14+13 (i.e. /ei ou/).

The voiced stops /b d g/ were represented by 44 43 41, and /h s f m n r l/ were represented by row 3; /h/ could be represented by either 31 or 32.
