The Dekavurian Language

Geoff's homepage -> Artificial Languages -> Dekavurian

Last update: 7 September 2007


Contents

Contents Introduction Sounds and Spelling Grammar Derivation Syntax Texts Writing

Introduction

Internal (pretend) history

Dekavurian is the name of yet another of the conlangs which is, or rather will be, featured in my book; it is supposed to have been spoken by colonists who arrived in the south-east of the land in which the early Liotans were then living, and is thus contemporary with Liotan. The variety presented here, properly known as Classical Dekavurian but referred to as simply Dekavurian for expediency, is the more formal variety used for writing official documents, histories, and the like. The original Dekavurians arrived 1300 years before the start of the book, by which time their language has developed into many different dialects; they are described in detail here. For the history of Dekavur, see here.

Dekavurian is an East Germanic language closely related to Gothic - the language spoken by the most powerful of the various Germanic tribes who contributed to the decline and fall of the Roman Empire, not this type of Gothic! It is thus a kind of second cousin once removed from English, or a first cousin of Old English and Old Norse; many words will thus seem familiar to speakers of modern Germanic languages, if a little mangled.

External (real) history

At around the time I was spending much time and effort rather fruitlessly trying to reconstruct the ancestor of older forms of Dekavurian, I had vague ideas of making a conlang derived from Indo-European, and when the phonology conveniently turned out to resemble that of Proto-Germanic, the pieces fell into place. Armed with an old copy (1910) of Joseph Wright's Grammar of the Gothic Language (the same book which turned the young J. R. R. Tolkien on to Gothic) and various files from Sean Crist's resources I was able to create a fairly detailed bogolang (i.e. a conlang derived from a natural language) with a decent-sized vocabulary.

The Gotish Tongue Website contains some more information about Gothic; the "wordcraft" link takes you to a reference grammar of Gothic upon which I based older forms of this file, and you may be able to detect some similarities. Here's a list of elements in Gothic names and a list of links to names in other languages. David Salo's Gothic lessons are recommended for those wishing to investigate Gothic more thoroughly. Another Gothic-derived conlang is Damien Erwan Perrotin's Gutiske Radje.


Phonology

Stress

The rules for stress in Dekavurian were the same as in Liotan, by coincidence: it was always on the first syllable, excluding certain prefixes. Unstressable prefixes are separated from their words by hyphens.

Consonants

The principal changes in the consonant-system between Primitive Germanic and Dekavurian were:

The resulting consonant system thus contained six stops /p t k/ and /b d g/, four fricatives /f T s x/, and the resonants /m n l r w j/. These are all transcribed with the corresponding letter from the Roman alphabet except for /T/, which is transcribed with the runic letter <ž> (known as "thorn"), and /x/, which is transcribed <h>.

The voiced stops had fricative allophones when preceded by a vowels and followed by a vowel or /l r w j/; the medial consonants of driban bjudan sagan were thus /B D G/. /s/ was /z/ in these environments and before a voiced stop; rasdo "speech, language" was thus [raz.do], and risan "to rise" was [ri.zan].

Vowels

As in Gothic, Primitive Germanic /e o/ merged with /i u/ respectively, and the resulting /i u/ lowered to /E O/ before /r x w/ and also /l/. Unusually for a Germanic language, vowel length was subsequently lost in Dekavurian; the diphthongs /au ai/ merged with /E O/, and /eu/ became /iu/ and eventually /ju/.

The result was a system containing the same seven vowel sounds /i e E a O o u/ as Vulgar Latin or Italian. /E O/ are transcribed <ai au>; the others are transcribed <i e a o u> as you'd hope. /E O/ merged with /e o/ word-finally in polysyllables.

Phonotactics

The consonants which were permitted at the ends of words were /m n l r/ and /t f s T x/; in polysyllables, only /t s n T/ were found with any frequency. Additionally there was the cluster /st/ in the common words ist "is" and wast "you were".


Grammar

Dekavurian grammar recognised the following parts of speech: Nouns Adjectives Pronouns Pre- and post-positions Verbs Adverbs Conjunctions Numbers

Nouns

Dekavurian nouns inflected for three genders (masculine, feminine, neuter), three cases (nominative, genitive, dative), and two numbers (singular and plural). The declensions of neuter and masculine nouns were very similar; the gender was differentiated in other parts of speech. Broadly speaking, the nominative case was used as the subject and object of a verb; the genitive case was used when one noun qualified another; and the dative case was used when the noun was the object of a postposition.

Dekavurian retained the older Germanic distinction between strong and weak nouns, of each of which there were four declensions. The inflectional endings gradually simplified and regularised over time, with the final /a e/ of the disyllabic endings being regularly dropped in speech; the endings shown in the tables below are the oldest. Masculine, feminine, and neuter gender are colour-coded as blue, red, and green respectively in the table headings.

The first declension was the commonest and contained masculine and neuter /a/-stem nouns. There were three subtypes of masculine nouns, representing Primitive Germanic /-a/, /-ja/, and /-r/ stems; the first two of these had equivalents in the neuters.

case"stone" "ridge" "father" "tree" "rib"
Singular
Nomstaina hrugja fadra traiwa ribja
Genstainis hrugjis fadras traiwis ribjis
Datstaino hrugjo fadri traiwi ribji
Plural
Nomstainos hrugjos fadris traiwas ribjas
Genstainun hrugjun fadrun traiwun ribjun
Datstainamehrugjamefadrume traiwameribjame

The third subtype contained only the kinship terms fadra and brodra, and the masculine forms of the pronoun ažra "the other one". Aside from the nominative singular, the inflectional endings of these nouns later assimilated to those of the first subtype, thus brodros for "brothers".

The vowels in the genitive and dative plural endings often assimilated to the /o/ or /a/ of the nominative plural, with /jime/ becoming /ime/. These changes, as with similar changes in other declensions, were also reflected in adjectives, articles, demonstratives, and anywhere else appropriate.

The second, third and fourth declensions continued Germanic /i/, /o:/, and /u/ stem nouns respectively. Nouns of the third declension were all feminine; those of the second and fourth could be of all three genders, although /u/-stem neuters were very rare. Second declension neuter nouns declined the same as masculines.

case"lake (2)" "house" (2) "horse" (3) "berry" (3) "sword" (4) "hand" (4) "apple" (4)
Singular
Nomsaiwi gardi aihwo basjo hairu handu aplu
Gensaiwis gardis aihwus basjus hairos handos aplos
Datsaiwo garde aihwe basje hairo hande aple
Plural
Nomsaiwis gardis aihwus basjus hairawe handawe aplawe
Gensaiwjun gardjun aihwun basjun hairiwunhandiwunapliwun
Datsaiwime gardime aihwomebasjome hairume handume aplume

In the second declension, the genitive plural ending later became /-jin/ and eventually /-in/; in the third, the dative plural ending later became /-jume/. The exceptional nominative and genitive plural endings /-awe/ and /-iwun/ of the fourth declension persisted long enough to spread to other declensions in some dialects; in others they became /-us/ and /-jun/.

The weak declensions were characterised by /n/ in all endings except the nominative singular and dative plural. Nouns of declensions 5 through 7 were masculine, feminine and neuter respectively; declension 8 contained feminine nouns, including many abstracts in /-i-/.

case "man" (5) "songbird" (6) "calf" (7) "sea" (8)
Singular
Nomgume finkjo kalbo mari
Gengumen finkjon kalbin marin
Datgumin finkjon kalbin marin
Plural
Nomgumanefinkjonekalbonemarine
Gengumun finkjun kalbun marjun
Datgumumefinkjumekalbumemarime

Adjectives

Dekavurian adjectives declined for case, number, and gender whether used predicately or attributively, and took two sets of endings, known as "strong" and "weak". The weak endings, which were the same as the endings of nouns of declensions 5 6 7, were the same for all adjectives. The strong endings were influenced by both the pronominal and nominal (specifically first and third) declensions.

Most adjectives declined like hwita "white", as shown below:

 Strong Weak
CaseMasculine Feminine Neuter Masculine Feminine Neuter
Singular
Nomhwitan hwito hwitat hwite hwito hwito
Genhwitis hwitus hwitis hwiten hwiton hwitin
Dathwitom hwitem hwitim hwitin hwiton hwitin
Plural
Nomhwites hwitus hwitas hwitanehwitone hwitone
Genhwitun hwitun hwitun hwitun hwitjun hwitun
Dathwitamehwitomehwitamehwitumehwitjumehwitume

As usual, /j/ disappeared before /i/, so the strong masculine and neuter genitive singulars of midja "middle" were midis.

Some adjectives had strong nominative singulars in /i/ or /u/, such as skirin skiri skirit "clear" and angun angu angut "narrow". These vowels appeared as /i/ and /u/ in place of /a/ in the appropriate plural endings.

Attributive adjectives always preceded their nouns. The weak endings were used with attributive adjectives which were accompanied by a demonstrative adjective, the strong endings otherwise. Thus:

Comparisons

Dekavurian formed the comparitive and superlative degrees of comparison by adding -isa and -(t)uma to the adjective. The comparitive was always declined weak, the superlative weak or strong as appropriate, and the noun or pronoun being compared to preceded the adjective and was itself preceded by swa. Thus swa lamba hwitan "as white as a sheep", swa lamba hwitise "whiter than a sheep"; hwitume lamba "the whitest sheep", hwituman lamba "a very white sheep".

Some adjectives had irregular comparitives and superlatives. The commonest, some of which had cognates in English, were:

PositiveComparitiveSuperlativeMeaning
goža batisa bastuma good, better, best
ubla wairsa wairsumabad, worse, worst
mangamaisa maistumamany, more, most
fawa minnisaminnuma few, less, least

The superlative suffix also appeared in, among others, fruma "first" and hinduma "last".

Demonstratives and articles

Dekavurian had neither definite nor indefinite ("a") articles, although both developed at later stages of the language.

There were three types of demonstrative adjective. "This", referring to something near to the speaker, was based on the stem her-; "that", which referred to something near the listener, used the stem žas-; and "yonder", which referred to something near to neither, was based on jain- respectively. All of these took the strong adjective endings; thus hero mave "this girl", žasan staina "that stone", jainat swina "yonder pig".

The demonstrative pronouns were second declension nouns derived from the demonstrative articles, such as heri heris "this one, these ones". Their neuter singulars ended in -at.

Pronouns

Dekavurian personal pronouns retained inflections for the accusative case and the increasingly rare dual in the first and second persons.

case1 2 3 masc3 fem3 neut
Singular
Nomih žu is si it
Accmih žuh in ija it
Genmina žina ina isa ita
Datmis žis im isai im
Dual
Nomwit jut
Accunkisinkwis
Genunka inku
Datunkiminkwim
Plural
Nomwis jus ijesijusijas
Accusis iswis ijesijusijas
Genusa isu isra
Datusim iswim isim

The genitive pronouns could precede or follow the noun, and took the strong or weak adjectival endings respectively; any associated adjective took the strong adjective endings. Thus "my old pig" was either alžat swina minu or minat alžat swina.

There was also a reflexive pronoun, corresponing to "-self", which had neither plural nor nominative case; its forms were accusative sih, genitive sina, and dative sis. Sina always referred to the subject of the clause; compare sinat boka lasat "he read his (own) book" with inat boka lasat "he read his (someone else's) book".

The possessive pronouns were derived from the genitives. Most were declined according to the first (masculine and neuter) or third (feminine) declensions, except for inku and usu which declined like the fourth: mina "mine (masculine singular)", usus "ours (feminine plural)".

The relative pronoun agreed with its antecedent and was a combination of the stem sw- and the strong endings: mawi swo lisaž "the girl who is reading". The masculine nominative singular was swe.

Pre- and post-positions

Coincidentally, some of the uses of these were the same as with Liotan.

In earlier Germanic, the words known as prepositions could be placed both before and after their objects. In Dekavurian, the position afterwards was preferred in writing, somewhat less so in speech; for example traiwi fora "in front of a/the tree". Accordingly, the term postposition is used here. All postpositions originally governed the accusative and dative cases, but as the accusative became identical to the nominative, the dative case became used exclusively as a postpositional case.

The postpositions were remodelled on a three-term system specifying motion towards, rest, and motion away from. The first of these was unmarked, the other two were formed with suffixes -a and -(ž)ro; for example for fora foržro "to in front of, in front of, from in front of". Some postpositions had only two terms, for example uta utro "outside, out of", and some only one, such as mit "with" and unda "until, as far as".

Interrogative, negative, and indefinite words

The principal indefinite adjectives were: All of these took the strong adjective endings and were declined in the singular only, except for alla which meant "all" when used in the plural. Their pronominal forms declined like nouns of the second declension, except that the neuter nominative ended in -at; thus aihi "anyone", allat "everything", nihi "nobody".

hwa "who?" declined like a first declension noun in the singular only; the neuter hwat, of course, was used for "what?".

"Which?" was hwažra when used of two and hwari when used of more than two; these declined like hwita and skiri respectively. Note also hwilka "what sort of", which declined ilke hwita.

"Whither?, where?, whence?" were hwar hware hwažro, by analogy with the prepositions. hwe hwan hwi were respectively "how, when, why", and were indeclinable.

Verbs

Dekavurian verbs inflected in four conjugations for two tenses (present and past), three moods (indicative, subjunctive, and imperative), and two numbers (singular and plural). The older dual survived in the first person only, which had /w/ in place of the /m/ in the plural, but was very rarely used and eventually disappeared. There was further a single infinitive form, and one participle (verbal adjective) in each tense; the present participle was active and always declined weak, while the past participle was passive and declined both weak and strong.

All finite verb forms consisted of endings for person suffixed to the verbal stem. The stem in the present tense consisted of the verbal root plus, except in the first person singular indicative, a thematic vowel. The formation of the past tense divided verbs, as elsewhere in Germanic, into weak and strong: the past stem of weak verbs suffixed /-id-/ to the present stem, that of strong verbs changed the vowel.

Endings

The personal endings are shown below.

 IndicativeSubjunctive
PersonPresentPastPresentPast
1 sing-o -a - -i
2 sing-s -is -s -is
3 sing-e -e
1 plur-ma -uma-ma-ima
2 plur-že -uže-že-iže
3 plur-nde-una-na-in

The -že in the second person plural was a Dekavurian innovation by analogy with the first and third persons. In addition, the endings for the infinitive and present participle were -n -nda added to the present stem; the ending of the past participle was -ta in weak verbs and -na in strong verbs. Verbs will be cited hereafter in the infinitive.

The imperative was the same as the present indicative in the first and second persons plural; in the second person singular it was formed by dropping the final /-s/ of the present indicative. Dekavurian also had a third person imperative, which was like the first person plural with the -ma replaced by -do in the singular and -ndo in the plural.

Dekavurian verbs fell naturally into four regular conjugations, a handful of preterite-present verbs, and the irregular "to be".

First conjugation

This was the commonest and most varied conjugation; it consisted mainly of denominative verbs formed from nouns, such as dailjan "to deal" from daila "part, share", and causatives from strong past tenses, such as raisjan "to raise" from rais past of risan "to rise". The thematic vowel varied between /i/ and /ja/ in the indicative, and was was /je/ in the subjunctive.

 IndicativeSubjunctive
PersonPresentPastPresentPast
1 singdail-jo dail-id-a dail-je- dail-id-i
2 singdail-is dail-id-is dail-je-s dail-id-is
3 singdail-iž dail-id-e dail-je-ž dail-id-e
1 plurdail-jama dail-id-umadail-je-madail-id-ima
2 plurdail-iže dail-id-užedail-je-žedail-id-iže
3 plurdail-jandedail-id-un dail-je-nadail-id-in
part dail-jandadail-it-a   

Some first conjugation verbs had stems which ended in a vowel. The /j/ of these verbs changed to /w/ before the endings which began with /i/, i.e. all past endings, the 2 3 sing and 2 plural present indicative, and the past participle; /E O/ before the /j/ became /a/, and /i/ before it became /E/.

  "to do""to sew"
Infinitive taujansjujan
1 sing pres ind taujo sjujo
2 sing pres ind tawis sjaiwis
1 sing past ind tawidasjaiwida
1 sing past subjtawidisjaiwidi
Past participle tawitasjaiwita

In speech, the vowel of the weak past tense suffix was often dropped after single /m n l r s z w/, and sometimes after other single consonants and some clusters; the /d/ devoiced to /t/ after the voiceless /p t k f s x/, and /Tt/ became /tt/. The clusters /nkt/, /ngt/, and /nxt/ all became /nxt/ and later /xt/, changing the preceding vowel. For example dailida drausida brangida tawida "I shared, I threw, I brought, I did" > dailda drausta braxta tawda.

Second and third conjugations

Aside from the same loss of the thematic vowel before the /d/ of the past tense, neither of these conjugations had the complications of the first conjugation.

The second conjugation principally consisted of denominative verbs, such as fiskon "to fish" from fiska "fish" and luston "to desire" from lustus "desire". The thematic vowel was /e/ in the present subjunctive and /o/ elsewhere.

The third conjugation largely contained stative verbs like bauwen "to dwell" and haben "to have". The thematic vowel was /je/ in the present subjunctive, a Dekavurian innovation by analogy with the first conjugation, and /e/ elsewhere.

Fourth conjugation (strong verbs)

The thematic vowel varied between /a/, /i/, and /e/ in parallel with the first conjugation.

The seven classes (Ablautreihen) of Germanic strong verbs were increased to ten in Dekavurian by the change of older short /i u/ to /e o/ before /l r w x/. The classes were distinguished by the of vowels in the verbal stem, of which there could be up to four:

  1. infinitive, present infinitive and subjunctive, present participle
  2. past singular indicative and subjunctive
  3. past plural indicative and subjunctive
  4. past participle

The vowels in each class were as shown below, with the infinitive, first person singular and plural of the past tense, and the past participle. The forms should be compared with their cognates elsewhere in Germanic.

Type1 2 3 4 meaning
1 driban draiba dribuma dribana drive
2 kjusan kausa kusuma kusana choose
3a bindan banda bunduma bundana bind
3b wairpanwarpa waurpuma waurpanathrow
4a niman nama nemuma numana take
4b tairan tara teruma taurana destroy
5a giban gaba gebuma gibana give
5b saihwansahwa sehwuma saihwanasee
6 alan ola oluma alana grow
7 faldan failda failduma faldana fold
7 sklepansklaipasklaipumasklepanasleep

The stem vowel in the 7th class could be any of /e E a O o/, although verbs with /E/ tended to join classes 3b or 4b; thus the past of fraisa "I tempt" was usually frasa rather than fraisa.

In the second class, the /j/ in the present spread to the other forms by analogy, for example the first person past indicatives of kjusan were regularised to kjausa and kjusuma. The same, of course, also happened in English, where the initial /tS/ of choose was generalised to chose.

As an example, niman "to take" is conjugated in full below.

 IndicativeSubjunctive
PersonPresentPastPresentPast
1 singnim-o nam-a nim-e- nam-i
2 singnim-is nam-is nim-e-s nam-is
3 singnim-iž nam-e nim-e-ž nam-e
1 plurnim-ama nem-uma nim-e-manem-ima
2 plurnim-iže nem-uže nim-e-ženem-iže
3 plurnim-andenem-un nim-e-nanem-in
part nim-andanum-an-a  

As with the first conjugation, strong verbs whose stems ended in a vowel plus /j/ changed the /j/ to /w/ before /i/, with /E O/ becoming /a/: waijan "to blow" had waijo "I blow" but wawis "you blow", and past indicative weja but past subjunctive wewi and past participle wewin.

Pretrite-presents

These verbs, most of which were modal in meaning, were originally past tenses of strong verbs from which new weak past tenses were formed; consequently, they took the usual past tense endings in the present tense, and had no past participles. The most common were the following.

1 pres4 pres 1 pret 1 subj meaning
waita wituma wista witje know (as fact)
kanna kunnuma kuža kunnje know (be acquainted)
žarba žaurbumažaurbidažaurbjeneed
darsa daursumadaursta daursjedare
skala skaulumaskaulda skauljebe obliged
mana munuma munda munje think, believe
maga maguma mahta magje be allowed ("may")
oga oguma ohta ogje fear ("ought")
kona kunuma konda kunje be able ("can")
wailjawailjumawailda wailje intend ("will")
mota motuma mosta motje have to ("must")

"To be"

Wisan, the most irregular verb in Dekavurian, was conjugated as follows.

 IndicativeSubjunctive
PersonPresentPastPresentPast
1 singsom was sije wesi
2 singis wast si(je)swesis
3 singist waž si(je)žwesiž
1 plursuma wesumasima wesima
2 pluriste wesužesiže wesiže
3 plursinde wesun sina wesin
part wisandawisana

Adverbs

Adverbs could be derived from adjectives with the suffix -ba, thus baihtaba "brightly", baldaba "boldly". These adverbs formed their comparitives with -is and their superlatives with -asta: baihtabis "more brightly", baihtabasta "most brightly".

Negation was expressed by ni, which was also the word for "no", preceding the verb: ni kanna "I do not know". Its opposite, the word for "yes", was je, which could be used as an emphatic particle: je kanna "I do know".

Other adverbs were the temporal ju "already", nu "now", and žan "then", and ga-samo "together".

Adverbs of place and motion

These were built on the same three-term system as postpositions; for example her "hither, to here", hera "here", heržro "hence, from here". Similarly were hwer "where", žar "there", jenar "yonder", aljar"elsewhere", allar"everywhere", sumar"somewhere", ehar "anywhere", and nihar"nowhere".

Conjunctions

The principal conjunctions are shown below.

Coordinatingjah and
jah ... jah both ... and
nih and not
žo, aižo or
ansuh ... aižoeither ... or
jaže ... jaže whether ... or
nih ... nih neither ... nor
ah but
nih ... ah not only ... but also
Conclusive nu, nuh, duže therefore
Conditionaljabe if
jaže and if
nibe unless, if ... not
jo whether
Causal alli, alže because
Final i, ži that
swaswe so that
ibe lest, so that ... not
faur at in order to (+ infinitive)
Temporal swe just as
mižan while
susi as soon as
faurži before that
unte until

Additionally, there were conjunctive varants of interrogative pronouns, which changed the initial /h/ to /s/: swa "who", swat "what", swe "how", swilka "which", swar "whither", and so on.

Numbers

The numbers from one to ten, together with the cardinals to 20 and the higher twenties, were:

 CardinalOrdinal + 10 x 10
1 aina fruma ainlifa ---
2 twai ažra twalifa twaitigju
3 žrisa žridja žritaihun tritigju
4 faura faurta fidwortaihunfairtigju
5 fifa fifta fiftaihun fiftigju
6 saiha saihta saihtaihun saihtigju
7 sibna sibunta sibuntaihun sibuntigju
8 ahta axtauntaahtauntaihunahtauntigju
9 njuna njunta njuntaihun njuntigju
10 taihna taihunta--- hunda

fruma, ažra, and žridja were always declined strong; the other ordinals were always declined weak. "7th" and "8th" had more colloquial forms siunta and ahta; the ambiguity of ahta was very seldom pernicious. "Both" was baiž plus the strong adjective endings.

Only aina twai žrisa were inflected; aina was, of course, also used as the indefinite article, and took the strong adjective endings as shown above. twai žris were declined as follows:

mascfemneut masc fem neut
twaitwotwa žrisažrisažri
twainažrina
twainažrina

Higher numbers up to 99 were formed with the unit plus ja "and" and the ten; thus "twenty-one" was ain-ja-twai-tigju. "200" and "1000" were twa hunda and žusunda.

The final /a/ of the cardinals was usually dropped in speech, except when counting.


Derivation

Unlike Liotan, Dekavurian used both prefixes and suffixes for derivation. In general, prefixes altered the meaning of the base word, whereas suffixes could create new parts of speech. Many derivational affixes have cognates in English.

Prefixes

Many prefixes were derived from pre- and postpositions, and were transparent in meaning:

Sometimes, a prefix added a perfective sense to verbs; for example af-wairpan "to throw away" implied a finality not present in mere wairpan "to throw".

The following prefixes were all unstressed.

fra- and ga-, when used with verbs, had exclusively perfective meanings; fra-drinkan meant "to drink up" compared with drinkan "to drink", and ga-drusan meant "to fall down" whereas drusan was closer to "to be falling".

ga- with nouns formed collectives, as with ga-bairga "mountain range".

id- corresponds to the Latin re-: id-gangan "to return", id-sagan "to reply".

un-, as in English, negates, often pejoratively: un-froda "unwise, stupid". Similar is missa-, which has connotations of "wrongly": missa-fražjan "to misunderstand".

in(a)- formed inchoatives, such as in-brikan "to start to break", in-brinnan "to catch fire".

Suffixes forming nouns

Nominae agentis were formed from any part of speech with -(a)rja (m1): waullo "wool" > waullarja "fuller", ljužon "to sing" > ljuž(a)rja "singer". The feminine was -arjo, thus ljutharjo. A less productive suffix was -je (m5), feminine -jo (f6): wardjan "to guard" > wardje "guard".

-inga (m1), feminine -ingo (m3), denoted association, and was usually added to names; thus wairžinga "a follower of Wairža".

Feminine nouns could also be derived with -ino and -esso: wardino or wardesso "female guard", rikesso "queen, female ruler".

-andi (m2 and f2) formed names of people from verbs:frijon "to love" > frindi "friend", saijan "to sow" > saijandi "sower".

There were several suffixes which created abstract nouns from adjectives. The commonest were -duži (f2), -ižo (f3), and -(in)assu (m4): manga "many" > mangaduži "abundance", djupa "deep" > djupižo "depth", ibna "level, even" > ibnassu "evenness" (contracted from ibninassu). Less common was -žwo (f3), as in frižwo "love, friendship".

Abstract nouns and result nouns were derived from weak verbs with -ini -oni -aini (f2) according to conjugation: laisjan "to teach" > laisini "doctrine", lažon "to invite" > lažoni "invitation", riren "to tremble" > riraini "tremor".

Two further suffixes creating result nouns were -unnja (n1), also found as -unja, and -jo (n7): witan "to know" > witunja "knowledge", aiskon "ask" > aiskjo "question, request".

Instrument nouns were created from verbs with -(ai)lu (n7): skjuban "to shove" > skjublu "shovel".

Diminutives were formed with -ila and -ika, coincidentally identical to the Liotan diminutive suffixes: hundila "little dog", fuglika "little bird".

Suffixes forming adjectives

-aga -aha -iga -iha commonly made adjectives from nouns: moda "anger" > modaga "angry", gabi "wealth" > gabiha "rich". The /g/ and /x/ in the suffix were in free variation.

Adjectives of quality were derived from nouns with -iska and -lika: fugla "bird" > fugliska or fuglalika, both meaning "bird-like".

Adjectives of material were derived from nouns denoting substances with -ina: gaulža "gold" > gauldina "golden".

-faulla added to a noun was equivalent to English "-full", and -losja was its reverse: age "fear" > agifaulla "fearful, scared", namu "name" > namulosja "nameless". These had corresponding abstract noun suffixes -faulsa and -losta.

Adjectives could be derived from the past tenses of strong verbs with -ra and -la, although these suffixes had ceased to be productive: bitra "bitter" from bitan "to bite" and flaugla "swift" from fljugan "to fly".

Two suffixes formed adjectives from verbs. -sama, related to sama "same", expressed a tendency: rodjan "to speak" > rodisama "talkative, garrulous". Passive ability was expressed with -bara: drinkibara "drinkable".

Suffixes forming verbs

-atjan (w1) intensified the meaning of a verb: sklahan "to hit" > sklah(a)tjan "to batter".

A common denominal suffix was -inon (w2): skalka "servant" > skalkinon "to be a servant", "to serve".

Circumfixes

A circumfix is a combination of a prefix and a suffix, a combination quite commonly used in Dekavurian to make verbs from nouns and adjectives. By far the commonest such suffix was the -jan still visible by itself in many verbs, such as raisjan "to raise" from the past tense of risan "to rise".

The prefixes were always unstressed. Some examples of verbs formed with circumfixes are shown below; note that many of them had figurative meanings.

bi- and in- in this context both had the meaning of "to provide with". in- was preferred before vowels, and was often combined with bi- to give bin-.


Syntax

Uses of the cases

The nominative case was used for the subjects of verbs, and for most nominal objects. The accusative was only used for pronominal objects.

The genitive was the case of possession, ownership, dependency, and so on; as in English, the dependent noun followed the independent noun: lambis habda "the sheep's head", airžus ludje "the surface of the earth". Prepositions and postpositions derived from nouns governed the genitive, such as stažain "instead of, in place of".

The dative was used with most prepositions and postpositions, and as the indirect object of verbs of telling, saying, teaching, and so on: mangos waurdas im soga "I said many words to him", i braton mosti im soga "I told him that he had to go".

Word order

In Dekavurian, modifiers generally preceded the words they modified; this is why attributive adjectives and genitives always preceded their nouns. More importantly, the default word order was SOV, thus minat swina aldjat ist "my pig is old", except for commands, in which the verb in the imperative came first.

Subject pronouns were not required, except for emphasis. A nominal subject required the third person singular or plural as appropriate: skipa sinkwaž "the ship is sinking", skipas sinkwande "the ships are sinking".

Passives

Passives were formed with wisan "to be" and the strong verb wairžan "to become" plus the past participle; wairžan expressed the action of process, while wisan indicated the rsulting state. Thus skipa sunkwanat wairžiž "the ship is being sunk", skipa sunkwanat ist "the ship has been sunk". The agent of verb in the passive was indicated with žairh, thus žairh gumane gaumida was "I was seen by the men".

Subordination

A subordinate clause usually preceded the main clause. Unless the main verb was a modal verb, an infinitive in a subordinate clause was preceded by at: faur at skipas gaumjan žar bratoda "I went there to see the ships", ... at bauwen frumodun "they began to dwell" in the second line of the Babel text; but isro rasdo rodjan ni kanna "I cannot speak their language".

The subjunctive mood was used for a finite verb following the final conjunctions i, ži "that", swaswe "so that", ibe "lest, that not", and temporal conjunctions such as faurži "before" and aftri "after": alže ni wisti isim aiskoda "I asked them because I did not know", swaswe skipas gaumidi žar bratoda "I went there so that I would see ships". Very commonly, these conjunctions were used in dependent clauses following verbs of reporting, wishing, hoping, and so on: i si ljužaiž bjudo "I ask her to sing".

The subjunctive mood was also used in the dependent clause following the conditional conjunctions jabe "if", jaži "and if", and nibe "unless": ljužaiž jabe isai bjudo "if I ask her to, she will sing".

Relative clauses

A relative clause usually preceded its antecedent: swas gaumida skipas fawas wesuna "The ships that I saw were few". A peculiarity of Dekavurian was that relative clauses behaved like adjectives, and followed a demonstrative or quantifier which governed the noun: heres swas gaumida skipas "these ships which I saw".

Omission of pronouns

Third-person pronouns could be omitted in nonambiguous situations; four examples may be seen in the Babel text.

Questions

A statement was turned into a question by placing an at the start and, usually, following the verb with one of two interrogative particles. The particles were nju, which expected a positive answer, and ibai, which expected a negative answer. For example, an si ljužaiž nju "she is singing, isn't she?", an si ljužaiž ibai "she isn't singing, is she?" an by itself implied no expectation of the answer: an si ljužaiž "is she singing"?

Texts

Of course, no constructed language is complete without a Babel text. This one is based, as usual, on a somewhat formal literal translation of the English, and thus differs considerably from the Crimean Gothic version.

  1. Ja jainem hwilon inna airžo aino rasdo ja fawas waurdas habede.
  2. Ja mižan gumane kwaildo ustro kwemun, flatan gawi Shinar inna funduna, ja žara at bauwen frumodun.
  3. Ja alle ažrame rodide, "manwjama waddjustainos ja bakkama [ijes] faulluba. Ja waddjustainos stažain stainun ja žaho stažain maurtris habedun.
  4. Ja rodidune, "timrjama baurgo ja halwa mit [itim] habdo hinnom inna, ja gibama namu sis du, ibe airžus ludje anna strautes wairžema".
  5. Ja Guža swes gumane timridun baurgo ja halwa at gaumjan dalaž bratode.
  6. Ja Guža soge, "gaumi! ainga aino žjudo sinde, ja herat žases swa wailjun ainga fruma ist, ja swat gairnjande nihat un-mahtigat ist".
  7. "Bratome dalaž, ja um-wagjama [isro] rasdo, swaswe alle ažres ni fražjež".
  8. Swa Guža žaržro airžus ludje anna straude, ja halwa at timrjan af-letun.
  9. Ja swa itat namu Babel waurde, alli žara Guža žjudus rasdo um-wagide, ja žara [ijes] airžus ludje anna straude.

This construes as follows:

  1. And yonder(dat) time(dat) in earth one language and few words had.
  2. And while men east(dat) out-of came, flat region Shimar in found-they, and there to dwell began-they.
  3. And each others(dat) said, "prepare-we(imp) bricks and bake-we(imp) [them] fully". And bricks instead-of stone(gen) and clay instead-of mortar(gen) had-they.
  4. And said-they, "build-we(imp) city and tower with [its(masc dat)] head(dat) heavens(dat) in, and give-we(imp) name self(dat) to, lest earth(gen) face(dat) on scattered become-we(subj)".
  5. And God which men built city and tower to see down went.
  6. And God said, "behold! only one people are-they, and this of-that which want-they only start is, and which want-they nothing impossible is".
  7. "Go-we(imp) down, and confuse [their] language, so that each others not understand(subj)."
  8. So God from-there earth(gen) face(dat) on scattered, and tower to build forsook-they.
  9. And so its name Babel became, because there God people(gen) language confused, and there [them] earth(gen) face(dat) on scattered.

Glossary