The Devrian Language

Geoff's homepage -> Artificial Languages -> Devrian

Last update: 30 November 2007


Introduction

Introduction Phonology Grammar Derivation Syntax The Babel Text Vocabulary

External (real) history

Devrian is presented here in recognition of my Welsh fan-club on the ZBB, who requested information on the languages I mentioned in passing in the page about Dekavurian culture. In terms of phonology, it is the 'P' to Liotan's 'Q': its phonology closely resembles that of Welsh, whereas Liotan is inspired more by Irish and Scottish Gaelic.

Internal (pretend) history

Devrian belonged to the Central branch of Sunovian, and was the closest relative of Liotan; the closeness of the two languages meant that they had many morphological and syntactic features in common. Devrian was the dominant language in parts of what is now south-western Dekavur until the area's absorption into the Liotan Empire, and continued to be spoken by decreasing numbers after the area was overrun by the barbarians which brought down the Empire. Pockets of speakers survived for another two or three centuries, but Devrian eventually died out under pressure from Dekavurian and the then slowly reviving descendants of Liotan. The form described here is that which was spoken just before the barbarian invasions, when Devrian prestige was at its highest.


Phonology

Stress Consonants Vowels

Stress

Stress in native words was always on the penultimate syllable. Loanwords usually retained the same stress as in the source language.

Consonants

The consonant-system of Devrian was much simpler than that of Liotan. It consisted of the following:

Older forms of Devrian had two extra voiced fricatives /z/ and /G/, both of which were still indicated in the native orthography. At this stage of the language, /G/ had vocalised or disappeared altogether, while /z/ merged with /s/ with which it was in complementary distribution. The result of the merger was [s] when unlenited word-intially and before voiceless stops, and [z] otherwise including the lenition of /n/.

The transcription used here, for obvious reasons, follows the conventions of Welsh; thus /T D v k x N/ are written TH DD F C CH NG, the voiceless nasals are represented by MH NH NGH, and /K r l 4 j w/ are transcribed LL RR L R I W. /f/ is represented by FF, except when it resulted from spirant mutation of /p/, when it is written PH.

Mutations

As in Liotan, Devrian initial consonants were subject to mutations in certain environments. There were four types of initial mutation:

For example, call "dog" became gall, nghall, and chall after the first three mutations. The triggers of the mutations are indicated by -L -N -S -M respectively.

There was also an internal mutation, called provection, by which final voiced stops were devoiced when certain suffixes were added; for example, mud "green" had the equative degree mutedd.

Vowels

Devrian had seven simple vowels and fourteen diphthongs. The simple vowels were /i e a o u/ plus the two high central vowels /1 }/ (IPA /i u/); as per Welsh orthography they are transcribed I E A O W and Y U respectively. In some varieties /}/ merged with /1/; this was due to the influence of Liotan which had only /1/.

Vowel length was a strictly allophonic, i.e. non-distinctive, feature of simple vowels, and was related to stress, to the number of consonants following the vowel, and to the number of syllables in the word:

The capitalised vowels in Est "wind", AscEr "I bite" were thus short, those in cEn "water" and cAll "dog" were long, and those in cwEsar "I sang" and bOddus "goats" were variable. The length distinction was maintained in formal speech; elsewhere the short vowels had laxer values [I E @ O U I\ U\] and the long vowels were shortened to [i e a o u 1 }]. In broad transcription, cen cwesar est were thus formally [ke:n] [kwe:.sar] [est] and informally [ken] [kwE.s@r] [Est].

The diphthongs all had a high vowel as their second element, and may be grouped as shown below with their transcriptions. As with the simple vowels, /1/ and /}/ sometimes merged in the diphthongs.

plus a diphthong transcribed WY, which was the result of a merger of several diphthongs; it was variously realised as [ui u1 }i }1], and in unstressed syllables was more usually /w1/ or /wi/.

Vocalic alternations

More so than anywhere else in Sunovian, vocalic alternations were very important in Devrian, both in inflection and in derivation. The alternations can be grouped into three main types: positionally conditioned, phonologically conditioned, and ablaut.

The positionally conditioned alternations, of which there were six, are best exemplified with singulars and plurals. Generally speaking, a diphthong in a final syllable alternated with another diphthong or a simple vowel elsewhere; note that /a} eu ou/ thus formed three allophonic pairs with /e} 1u }u/.

Phonologically conditioned alternations, of which there were many, were caused by assimilations due to following /a i j/. The basic changes caused by /a/ were the lowering of preceding /1 } u/ to /e o }/ and /i/ to /ai ~ e/; those by /i j/ were the reverse, plus /a/ raising to /e/, /au ~ o/ fronting to /ai ~ e/, and /oi ou/ raising to /}i }u/. These are referred to as lowering and raising.

Ablaut was visible in derivation and particularly in the past tenses of verbs. The fundamental alternation was between /a/ and /e/; various other alternations occurred as a result of later changes, among them /o1 ~ e/, /e ~ }/, /e ~ 1/, and /}1 ~ i/.


Grammar

Nouns Adjectives Articles Pronouns Prepositions Verbs Numbers Adverbs Conjunctions

Nouns

Formally, Devrian nouns distinguished similar categories to those of Liotan: four cases (nominative, genitive, partitive, and dative), three genders (masculine, feminine, and neuter), and singular and plural numbers. The dual number did not survive in Devrian.

The inflectional endings had undergone much restructuring, with the result the nominative plural ending /s/ (older /z/, from the /n/ still observable in Liotan) was generalised to the genitive and partitive plurals. Some representative nouns are declined below.

Masculine nouns

There were four sub-declensions of masculine nouns, depending on the ending in the nominative plural:

Vocalic alternations were found in nouns of the first and fourth subtypes. The patterns of phonologically conditioned alternation may be seen in the declensions of dorth and dul, and those of positionally conditioned alternation (actually due to lowering) in that of bawdd.

Case"fog""tail""goat""stick""bone""ear"
Singular
Nom ffiod dorth bawddgirw tyli dul
Gen ffiododurthoboddogirwotyliodulo
Partffiodadorthaboddagirwatyliadola
Dat ffiodedurtheboddegirwetyliedule
Plural
Nom ffiodus durthus boddus girwstylisdules
Gen ffiodos durthos boddos girwostyliosdulos
Partffiodas dorthas boddas girwastyliasdolas
Dat ffiodadddorthaddboddaddgirwaddtyliadddoladd

Feminine and neuter nouns

The declensions of these nouns were much simpler; there was only one type of each gender, and alternations (between /au ~ o/ and /e/) were restricted to feminine nouns.

Case"dog""horse""girl""root""roof"
Singular
Nom call ffoin dawnbred llauth
Gen celly ffwynhydenybredu lleuthu
Partcalle ffoinhedonebredo lleutho
Dat celli ffwynhidenibredwy lleuthwy
Plural
Nom cellis ffwynhis denis bredwyslleuthwys
Gen callys ffoinhys donys breduslleuthus
Partcalles ffoinhes dones bredoslleuthos
Dat calleddffoinhedddoneddbredoddlleuthodd

Adjectives

Whether attributive or predicative, Devrian adjectives took the same endings as nouns of the appropriate declension for for gender, number, and case. Attributive adjectives always followed the noun to which they applied and declined for case, with their initial consonants being mutated according to case and number, and (in the nominative singular only) gender. As an example, the adjective pall "small" is declined below with the three nouns cawr "boy", pawr "flowering plant", and trasc "horn".

CaseMasculineFeminineNeuter
Singular
Nom cawr phall pawr ball trasc mhall
Gen coro ballo pery belly trascu ballu
Partcora phalla pore phalle trasco phallo
Dat core mhalle peri mhelli trascwy mhallwy
Plural
Nom corus ballus peris bellis trascwys ballwys
Gen coros mhallos porys mhallys trascus mhallus
Partcoras mhallas pores mhalles trascos mhallos
Dat coradd balladdporedd balleddtrascodd ballodd

Phonologically conditioned alternations occurred either in the feminine (raising), as here, or in the masculine (lowering), but not both.

Comparisons

As in Liotan, there were three comparitive degrees of adjectives, all of which were formed with suffixes.

The comparitive of superiority, which corresponded to the comparitive ("more") and superlative ("most") of English, added -of: pallof "smaller, smallest", swydiof "brightest", polof "thinner, thinnest" (from pawl "thin").

The comparitive of inferiority corresponded to English "less", "least", "not as adjective as", and was formed with -err: pallerr "not as small as", swydiorr "not as bright as", polerr "not as thin as".

The comparitive of equality expressed "as adjective as". It suffixed -edd, which caused provection of a preceding voiced stop: palledd "as small as", swydiedd "as bright as", poledd "as thin as".

A few very common adjectives had irregular comparitive stems:

Articles and demonstratives

The only article in Devrian was the definite, whose forms were as shown below.

CaseMasculineFeminineNeuter
Singular
Nom ta cher ti bawr ta nhrasc
Gen ta(s) gero te(s) bery taf drascu
Partta(s) chera te(s) phore taf thrasco
Dat ta nghere te mheri taf nhrascwy
Plural
Nom toe gerus te beris te thrascwys
Gen tw ngheros tw mhorys te drascus
Parttoe ngheras te mhores tai drascos
Dat toe(s) geradd tai(s) boneddtai nhrascodd

The three demonstratives "this", "that", and "yonder" were compounds of the ancestors of the Liotan demonstrative particles and the definite article. The stems were respectively enh- aeth- orth-; the masculine singular nominatives were thus enha-S aetha-S ortha-S, and the neuter genitive plural enhe-L aethe-L orthe-L.

Pronouns

Devrian distinguished singular and plural numbers in the pronouns, along with inclusivity in the first person plural and gender in the third person singular. In addition there were indefinite and reflexive pronouns.

Each pronoun inflected for nominative, genitive, and partitive cases, and had reduced forms which were used as object pronouns and after prepositions. Most reduced forms came in two forms, one for use after vowels and one for after consonants.

 Singular Plural
PersonNomGenPartReduced NomGenPartReduced
1 exc rresa-N saf-(e)s gesgoe-Ngoe-(y)g
1 inc ------------ derder-Nder-(y)dd
2 ffedo-Ldo-(w)f ffethffw-Nffaen-(w)n
3 mascai-Sas-a aeae-Naen-ae
3 fem yi-Les-y eiei-Nein-ei
3 neutui-Nos-u wyw-Nwyn-wy
indef ceca-N------ ------------
refl dideg-Ldeg-(i)d ------------

The third person pronouns referred to a noun of the same gender; a dog was thus referred to as y "she". The neuter plural wy was used to refer to more than one noun of mixed genders.

The demonstrative pronouns were compounds of the stems enh- aeth- orth and the third person pronouns: enha "this one" (masculine singular), orthwy "those ones" (neuter plural).

The relative pronoun, which declined for case, gender, and number, was a compound of ia- and the definite article. In the nominative singular it was thus masculine and neuter iada and feminine iadi or iedi. The initial syllable was often dropped in speech.

Prepositions

The uses of the prepositions in Devrian were more similar to Athomine than to Liotan, and as such probably better reflected the original Sunovian.

Rest was indicated with the genitive case, the preposition nasalising the noun: ffu nghaddono "in a house", twd neny "beside the girl", ned lleuthu "under the roof".

Motion towards used the dative case; the preposition sometimes had a different form, often with suffixed -e, and lenited the noun. Thus ffwy gaddone "into a house", twde ddeni "to beside a girl", nede leuthwy "to under a roof".

Motion away from used the partitive case, sometimes with a different change in form, and also lenited the noun: ffwy gaddona "out of a house", twdd ddone "from next to a girl", ned leutho "from under a roof".

Among the commoner prepositions were the following:

meaning TowardsRest Away from
towards rre --- ---
near, at, by --- bwys ---
from, away from--- --- med
outside, out ofdy den dy
inside, into ffwy ffu ffwy
on, onto ty ty ty
in front of nyfe nydd nydd
behind dure dur dur
above caste cast cest
below nede ned nyd
next to twde twd twd
between bydde bydd bydd

Compounds with prepositions

As stated above, the reduced forms of the personal pronouns were used after prepositions; thus ffws "in me", dures "behind me" (also durs), castu "behind it", and so on.

The article combined with a preceding preposition, mutating appropriately: deda "out of the", denha "outside the", dyda "from outside the" (all masculine singular). The mutation after the article was nasalisation in the singular and lenition in the plural; thus ffwyda nghaddone "into the house". The final vowel of the compound was usually dropped in speech.

Verbs

Devrian verbs inflected in four conjugations for person and various combinations of tense and aspect in indicative and subjunctive moods. Each verb also had an active and a stative participle; note that the description "active" is not opposed to "passive". Verbs will be cited in the first person singular of the simple present indicative.

Auxiliaries

Many verbal forms were compounds of a participle and either the copular form of "to be" or an otherwise meaningless auxilary verb. These verbs conjugated in the present tense as shown below; note the mutations caused by the auxiliary.

PersonAuxiliary"to be"
Singular
1 dwr-M edr
2 duf-N aif
3 du-N ain
Plural
1 excduae-S esce
1 incduedd-Neidde
2 duen-L eista
3 dues-L eisa
Other
indefdug-L aig
rel dwy-L ede, de

Inflectional endings

The endings for person and the two participles in all four conjugations are shown below. Note the provection caused by the stative participle.

Person"hide" "burn" "carve""see"
Singular
1 boil-ar yscar-er tab-wr toir-or
2 boil-af yscar-if tab-wf toir-af
3 boil-a yscar-e tab-w toir-e
Plural
1 exc boil-ae yscar-ai tab-oe toir-ae
1 inc boil-addyscar-eddtab-wddtoir-edd
2 boil-an yscar-en tab-wn toir-en
3 boil-as yscar-es tab-ws toir-es
Other
indef boil-ag yscar-eg tab-wg toir-ag
rel boil-u (oe)yscar-i tab-wy toir-i
Participles
activeboil-ad yscar-ed tab-od toir-th
stativeboil-esyscar-is tap-wystoir-is

The third person singular was used with a plural noun subject: casa te ddenis "the girls are singing", but casas "they are singing".

In more formal registers, fourth conjugation verbs raised the preceding vowel before the /i/ of the relative and lowered it before the 2 singular, 1 exc plural, and indefinite endings. The alternations were levelled out in more casual speech.

Indicative mood

The simplest verb form was the simple present, which expressed present actions otherwise unmarked for tense or aspect. It was formed by adding the personal endings to the verb stem, as shown above; thus boilar "I hide, I am hiding", yscare "it burns, it is burning", tabws "they carve, they are carving", toirae "we see, we are seeing".

Another simple form was the future, which added the second conjugation endings to the future stem. This stem was usually characterised by /T/, sometimes /t/ or /d/: thus boilther "I will hide", yscarthe "it will burn", taethes "they will carve" (with loss of older /G/), toirthai "we will see". The future of "to be" had the stem eith-, thus eithe "it will be".

The historic past was formed by adding the personal endings to the past stem, which in simple verbs was most commonly derived from the present stem by ablaut: belar "I hid", yscere "it burned", tebws "they carved", terae "we saw". Some verbs had more divergent past stems; among the commonest were mefror "I give" -> maror "I gave", engor "I go" -> padar "I went", and palor "I do" -> telor "I did".

The past of the auxiliary was based on the stem pl- and was a second regular conjugation verb which caused the same mutations as in the present. The past stem of "to be" was einh-, which also took the second conjugation endings.

The conditional was a combination of the future endings and the past stem: belther "I would hide", yscerthe "it would burn", teithes "they would carve", terthai "we would see". The conditional of "to be" had the stem ythe-.

The other tense-aspect combinations were expressed with compounds. One of each is shown below; note the mutations of the initial consonant of the participle caused by auxiliary verb.

Tense"I hide""it burns""they carve" "we see"Formation
Present imperfectdwr foilad du yscared dues dabed duae thoirthAuxiliary present + active
Present perfect dwr foiles du yscaris dues dapwys duae thoirisAuxiliary present + stative
Past imperfect pler foiladple yscaredplas dabed plai thoirthAuxiliary past + active
Past perfect pler foilesple yscarisplas dapwys plai thoirisAuxiliary past + stative
Simple past edr boiles ain yscariseisa tapwys esce toiris "to be" present + stative
Remote past einher boiles einhe yscariseinhes tapwys einhai toiris "to be" past + stative

Subjunctive mood

With the exception of the future and conditional, each verb form in the indicative mood had a corresponding form in the subjunctive mood.

The simple present of all conjugations was by adding /j/ to the present stem, raising the preceding vowel where appropriate, and the first conjugation endings. The past subjunctive was formed similarly from the past stem. For example:

The present subjunctive of the auxiliary was formed by replacing the /}/ with /j/, for example 2 singular dif and 2 plural dien; the first singular was dir and the relative dy, and the mutations were the same as in the indicative. The present subjunctive of "to be" was a regular formation on the stem tia-.

Imperative

The imperative, the form of the verb used for commands, was only used in the second person and the first person plural.

The second person singular imperative was the same as the presont subjunctive without the /j/ or the personal endings. The first and second person plural imperatives were formed by adding -idd and -in to this, with the appropriate vowel changes; thus the imperatives of the sample verbs were bwyl bwylidd bwylin, yscar ysceridd yscerin, taig teigidd teigin, twyr twyridd twyrin.

"To be"

Devrian distinguished copular and substantive forms of "to be". The couplar form was the one used in the simple and remote tenses; it had only present and past forms, and expressed identity, permanence, and so on. Thus ain ddawn y "she is a girl", ain rast y "she is tall" left no room for doubt about either state. Note the lenition of the word following the verb.

The conjugation of the substantive verb form was more regular than that of the coupla:

Person Present Past
Singular
1 dawr sair
2 dawf saif
3 daw sai
Plural
1 exc doe siae
1 inc doedd siedd
2 doen sien
3 does sies
Other
indef dawg saig
rel dawi sewi

Unlike in Liotan, the substantive verb could be substituted for the copula with no change in syntax. The difference in meaning was one of permanence; thus daw ddawn y implied that she was or would be something else, emphasising the temporary nature of this fact. Similarly, daw rast y "she is tall" implied that she was also capable of being short.

The future and subjunctive stems of the substantive verb were dod- and deia-.

Negative, and interrogative

Simple verbs were negated by preposing the negative particle lle-N: lle-moilar "I am not hiding", lle-nhoerae "we are not seeing". The particle was lost before the auxiliary, leaving behind the nasal mutation: nwr foilad "I do not hide", nuae thoerth "we do not see", mler foilad "I was not hiding".

The negative of the copula simply prefixed ll-, thus lledr, llaif, llain in the present singular and past stem lleinh-. The negative of the substantive verb replaced the initial /d/ or /g/ with /L/, thus first person singular llawr and llir.

The interrogative prefixed ffi-N: ffi-moilar "am I hiding?", ffinwr foilad "do I hide?". There was no negative interrogative.

Adverbs

The dative singular of an adjective was used as an adverb: swydwy "brightly", myddwy "quietly", ollwy "well".

The adverbs of place were compounds of the demonstrative stems enh- aeth- orth and the neuter singular nominal case endings: enhu "here", aetho "from there", orthwy "to yonder".

Numbers

Devrian, like Liotan, used a counting system based on twenties. The fundamental number words were:

 Unit+ 10x 20
1 mel-M cynefel cer
2 sen-L cynehen sencher
3 sel-L cynehel selcher
4 rryng-N cyneryng rryngher
5 der-N cynedder derger
6 non-N cyneson nongher
7 llung-N cynelung llungher
8 por-S cynebor porcher
9 swyth-S cynewythswycher
10 cwyn cynegwyn cwyngher

The absence of the article indicated "one" adequately, and mel by itself thus meant "only one": mel chawr "only one boy", but cawr "boy, a boy".

The cardinal numbers up to 19 were followed by the partitive plural of the noun: sel galles "three dogs", por dones "eight girls". Note also sel tai galles "three of the dogs", with the article, implying that there were more.

"11" to "19" were compounds of cyn, de "and", and the lenited unit. The medial /e/ was often dropped in casual speech, thus cynhel "13", cyndder "15", and so on.

cer "20" and its compounds were nouns which required the partitive singular: cer girwa "20 sticks", selcher gwyse "60 knives". Intermediate quantities placed the excess over the multiple of 20 after the noun, as with llwngher lleutho cynedder "155 roofs" (literally "seven score roofs and fifteen").

The ordinals had the same form as the cardinals, except ffur "first" and som(h) "second". All of them preceded the nominative singular of the noun, which did not take the article, and triggered spirant mutation: ffur chall "the first dog", por dawn "the eighth girl".

Conjunctions

The main coordinating conjunctions were de-L "and", dwy-L "but", and meng "or".

Derivation

Nominal suffixes

-on (masculine), cognate with the Liotan -ad, was a simple nominaliser: caddon "house" (from an obsolete root meaning "to build"), seion "barrier" (related to sedder "I obstruct").

-eg (feminine) was a diminutive: calleg "little dog", gwyseg "dagger" ("little knife", also gwysieg). This suffix found its way into Dekavurian as a feminine naming suffix.

Abstract nominal suffixes included -ast (neuter), -af and -an(h) (both masculine): swydiast "brightness", polaf "smallness", myddian "quiet".

Nominae agentis were formed with -ed, feminine -eidi: tabed "carver (male)", caseidi "singer (female)".

Neuter deverbal nouns denoting the results of actions were mostly formed with -ed, such as ffwysced "a jump", or -ob, as in palob "a deed".

-ag formed things and tools, which were neuter: moddag "spade" (moddar "I dig"), dostag "hammer, club" (dostar "I hit, I strike").

Adjectival suffixes

-awf was the equivalent of the Liotan adjectival suffixes -ámh and -imhin, thus ffiodawf "foggy, like fog, having much fog". Its opposite was -ol: eifol "fearless".

-udd with provection, derived from tuddor "to cause", was the equivalent of "-able": etudd "flexible" (related to oidar "I bend").

Verbal suffixes

-i-, cognate with Liotan -éach, formed second conjugation denominative verbs: cois "fish" -> cwyser "I fish".

-os- with provection formed fourth conjugation inceptives and causatives: myddi "quiet" -> myddiosor "I fall silent", oid "bent, curved" -> oitosor "I bend". The past tenses of these verbs had -us-, thus myddusor "I fell silent", and the subjunctives had -osia- and -usia-.

-af- was the equivalent of Liotan -abhach, and -ol- was its opposite. Both of these formed first conjugation verbs: sawd "blood" -> sodafar "I bleed", cenolar "I remove water from".


Syntax

Word order

Devrian, like Liotan, was consistently head-first; thus the dominant word-order was VSO, and attributive adjectives followed their nouns.

Pronominal objects were suffixed to the verb: toiror-w "I see you", eisa-u tabws "they carved it".

Uses of the cases

The cases of the noun were used much as in Liotan. Their uses after prepositions are not repeated here.

The nominative and partitive cases could both be used as the subject and object of the verb; the nominative referred to the entirety of the noun or nouns, the partitive to only part. Thus "I am drinking some water" would naturally be translated rrodar cena, with a partitive object; the use of the nominative in rrodar cen would imply that all of the water was being drunk. Similarly, compare casas te ddenis "the girls are singing" with casas te nones "some of the girls are singing".

The partitive was also used after nouns of quantity: cawdd girwadd "some sticks", ffustw cena "a lot of water".

The genitive indicated that one noun depended on another. The article was not used with the independent noun: ffur ceilly "a dog's head", ffur te geilly "the dog's head".

The dative, when not otherwise qualified with a preposition, was the case of the indirect object: mefror tyli te ngheilli "I give a bone to the dog". It was used after certain verbs such as "say", "tell", "order", and so on.

Uses of the tenses

As stated above, the simple present was the unmarked tense for present actions not further qualified: rrodar "I drink, am drinking". The corresponding tense for past actions was originally the historic past, for example rrwdar "I drank"; this had become a formal literary tense and was often replaced in speech by the simple past, thus edr rrodes.

The future tense described actions not yet begun in the present, and the conditional actions not yet begun in the past: rrother "I will drink", rrwther "I would drink".

The two imperfect tenses referred to actions which were happening in the background, uncompleted, or habitual: dwr rodad "I drink, am drinking, tend to drink", dwr rodes "I was drinking, used to drink, tended to drink". Their perfect counterparts described actions the fact of whose completion was in some way important: pler rodad "I have drunk", pler rodes "I drank, had drunk".

The remote past was a kind of pluperfect: einher rrodes "I drank, had drunk".

Subordinate clauses and the subjunctive mood

If the verb in the subordinate clause referred to an action not yet realised, it was either in the subjunctive mood, or the future or conditional tense, according to whether the action was certain or not. Compare:

If the subordinate verb referred to an action which was being or had been realised, the appropriate participle was used with the genitive of its subject:

Some types of subordinate clause could also be expressed by a combination of a preposition and the subjunctive mood, for example:

However, temporal subordinate clauses were more usually expressed with the particples:

Relative clauses

The structure of a relative clause resembled the Liotan, but did not use a relative particle. The verb in the relative clause was lenited:

V1 S1; V2 S1 >> V2 S1 V1(rel)
casa to ddawn; daw rast ti ddawn >> daw rast ti ddawn gasu
"the girl sings; the girl is tall" >> "the girl who is singing is tall"

V1 S1 O1; V2 S2 (S2 = O1) >> V2 S2 V1(rel) S1 rel-pron
fonhu ti gall ta chois; daw loir ta chois >> daw loir ta chois fonha ti gall iada
"the dog is eating the fish; the fish is white" >> "the fish which the dog is eating is white"

The same construction, with the copula ain, was used for emphasis:

V1 S1 >> du S1 V1(rel)
casa ti ddawn >> ain ti ddawn gasu
"the girl is singing" >> "it is the girl who is singing"

V1 S1 O1 >> ain S1 V1(rel) O1
fonhu ti gall ta chois >> ain ti gall fonhu ta chois
"the dog is eating the fish" >> "it is the dog who is eating the fish"

V1 S1 O1 >> ain O1 V1 S1 rel-pron
fonhu ti gall ta chois >> ain ta chois fonha ti gall iada
"the dog is eating the fish" >> "it is the fish which the dog is eating"


Babel text

This is a translation of the Babel Text into formal Devrian. The grammatical analysis follows without comment.

  1. De iw bedd orthaf fyddy mel ddodded de ydi seswas.
  2. De fero gallus, bedd aen rrosterth te ffuri, ffyfon ffuda neloro Simaro, de ddecuses orthu.
  3. De estas sei, "sedidd yscwylis, de ysceridd-wy darrwy". De iw yscwylis cawd samoru de ddior cawd llaigo bwyswy.
  4. De estas, "gweredd dagon de boided lla fur ffudw soilus, de fyfredd mal rredd, rre lle fusciag-ydd tyd cwasu".
  5. De derphada God rre diria ta dagon de da mhoided ple gwaris safedus gallos iada.
  6. De esta God, "twyr! ain mel ruf wy, de ddaw mel ddodded bwyswy, de ddaw lluf niei wy-mhaliedos enho, de ddoda llemhaludd lles wy-ysedo".
  7. "Teringedd, de dduwnedd salthwys ffwywy nuddede rre llen uwddas sei".
  8. De meddor ffusca God orthu tyd cwasu wy, de iastes gwyrias ta mhoided.
  9. Meddor einhe Babel i-mall, me einhe orthaf diwne God salthwys ffwywy nuddede ta rufo, de orthu ffusca tyd cwasu wy.

  1. And were through that time(gen) one language and few words(part).
  2. And found men, through their goings the east(part), plain in-the country(gen) Shimar(gen), and settled-they there(gen).
  3. And said-they each-other(dat), "let-us-make(inc) bricks, and let-us-burn=them completely". And was bricks in-place-of stone(part) and clay in-place-of mortar(part) at-them.
  4. And said-they, "let-us-build(inc) city and tower with head in-the clouds(gen), and let-us-give name to-us, to not scatter(indef subj) us on the world(gen)".
  5. And went-down God see(past subj) the city and the tower aux(past) build(stat part) children men(gen) rel-pronoun.
  6. And said God, "behold! is(copula) one people they, and is one language at-them, and is only start their-doings(part) this, and will-be impossible nothing their-wanting(part)".
  7. "Let-us-go down, and let-us-put confusion(pl) into-their language(dat) to not understand-they(future) each-other."
  8. And therefore scattered God there(gen) on-the world(gen) them, and forsook-they build-they(past subj) the tower.
  9. So was(copula) Babel its-name, because was there put(past) God confusion(pl) into-the language(dat) of-the people, and there(gen) scattered on world(gen) them.

Vocabulary

Nouns are given in the nominative singular and plural; adjectives in the masculine nominative singular; and verbs in the first person singular present and past of the indicative and subjunctive.