Last update: 30 November 2007
Older forms of Devrian had two extra voiced fricatives /z/ and /G/, both of which were still indicated in the native orthography. At this stage of the language, /G/ had vocalised or disappeared altogether, while /z/ merged with /s/ with which it was in complementary distribution. The result of the merger was [s] when unlenited word-intially and before voiceless stops, and [z] otherwise including the lenition of /n/.
The transcription used here, for obvious reasons, follows the conventions of Welsh; thus /T D v k x N/ are written TH DD F C CH NG, the voiceless nasals are represented by MH NH NGH, and /K r l 4 j w/ are transcribed LL RR L R I W. /f/ is represented by FF, except when it resulted from spirant mutation of /p/, when it is written PH.
For example, call "dog" became gall, nghall, and chall after the first three mutations. The triggers of the mutations are indicated by -L -N -S -M respectively.
There was also an internal mutation, called provection, by which final voiced stops were devoiced when certain suffixes were added; for example, mud "green" had the equative degree mutedd.
Vowel length was a strictly allophonic, i.e. non-distinctive, feature of simple vowels, and was related to stress, to the number of consonants following the vowel, and to the number of syllables in the word:
The capitalised vowels in Est "wind", AscEr "I bite" were thus short, those in cEn "water" and cAll "dog" were long, and those in cwEsar "I sang" and bOddus "goats" were variable. The length distinction was maintained in formal speech; elsewhere the short vowels had laxer values [I E @ O U I\ U\] and the long vowels were shortened to [i e a o u 1 }]. In broad transcription, cen cwesar est were thus formally [ke:n] [kwe:.sar] [est] and informally [ken] [kwE.s@r] [Est].
The diphthongs all had a high vowel as their second element, and may be grouped as shown below with their transcriptions. As with the simple vowels, /1/ and /}/ sometimes merged in the diphthongs.
plus a diphthong transcribed WY, which was the result of a merger of several diphthongs; it was variously realised as [ui u1 }i }1], and in unstressed syllables was more usually /w1/ or /wi/.
The positionally conditioned alternations, of which there were six, are best exemplified with singulars and plurals. Generally speaking, a diphthong in a final syllable alternated with another diphthong or a simple vowel elsewhere; note that /a} eu ou/ thus formed three allophonic pairs with /e} 1u }u/.
Phonologically conditioned alternations, of which there were many, were caused by assimilations due to following /a i j/. The basic changes caused by /a/ were the lowering of preceding /1 } u/ to /e o }/ and /i/ to /ai ~ e/; those by /i j/ were the reverse, plus /a/ raising to /e/, /au ~ o/ fronting to /ai ~ e/, and /oi ou/ raising to /}i }u/. These are referred to as lowering and raising.
Ablaut was visible in derivation and particularly in the past tenses of verbs. The fundamental alternation was between /a/ and /e/; various other alternations occurred as a result of later changes, among them /o1 ~ e/, /e ~ }/, /e ~ 1/, and /}1 ~ i/.
The inflectional endings had undergone much restructuring, with the result the nominative plural ending /s/ (older /z/, from the /n/ still observable in Liotan) was generalised to the genitive and partitive plurals. Some representative nouns are declined below.
Vocalic alternations were found in nouns of the first and fourth subtypes. The patterns of phonologically conditioned alternation may be seen in the declensions of dorth and dul, and those of positionally conditioned alternation (actually due to lowering) in that of bawdd.
| Case | "fog" | "tail" | "goat" | "stick" | "bone" | "ear" |
| Singular | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nom | ffiod | dorth | bawdd | girw | tyli | dul |
| Gen | ffiodo | durtho | boddo | girwo | tylio | dulo |
| Part | ffioda | dortha | bodda | girwa | tylia | dola |
| Dat | ffiode | durthe | bodde | girwe | tylie | dule |
| Plural | ||||||
| Nom | ffiodus | durthus | boddus | girws | tylis | dules |
| Gen | ffiodos | durthos | boddos | girwos | tylios | dulos |
| Part | ffiodas | dorthas | boddas | girwas | tylias | dolas |
| Dat | ffiodadd | dorthadd | boddadd | girwadd | tyliadd | doladd |
| Case | "dog" | "horse" | "girl" | "root" | "roof" |
| Singular | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nom | call | ffoin | dawn | bred | llauth |
| Gen | celly | ffwynhy | deny | bredu | lleuthu |
| Part | calle | ffoinhe | done | bredo | lleutho |
| Dat | celli | ffwynhi | deni | bredwy | lleuthwy |
| Plural | |||||
| Nom | cellis | ffwynhis | denis | bredwys | lleuthwys |
| Gen | callys | ffoinhys | donys | bredus | lleuthus |
| Part | calles | ffoinhes | dones | bredos | lleuthos |
| Dat | calledd | ffoinhedd | donedd | bredodd | lleuthodd |
| Case | Masculine | Feminine | Neuter |
|---|---|---|---|
| Singular | |||
| Nom | cawr phall | pawr ball | trasc mhall |
| Gen | coro ballo | pery belly | trascu ballu |
| Part | cora phalla | pore phalle | trasco phallo |
| Dat | core mhalle | peri mhelli | trascwy mhallwy |
| Plural | |||
| Nom | corus ballus | peris bellis | trascwys ballwys |
| Gen | coros mhallos | porys mhallys | trascus mhallus |
| Part | coras mhallas | pores mhalles | trascos mhallos |
| Dat | coradd balladd | poredd balledd | trascodd ballodd |
Phonologically conditioned alternations occurred either in the feminine (raising), as here, or in the masculine (lowering), but not both.
The comparitive of superiority, which corresponded to the comparitive ("more") and superlative ("most") of English, added -of: pallof "smaller, smallest", swydiof "brightest", polof "thinner, thinnest" (from pawl "thin").
The comparitive of inferiority corresponded to English "less", "least", "not as adjective as", and was formed with -err: pallerr "not as small as", swydiorr "not as bright as", polerr "not as thin as".
The comparitive of equality expressed "as adjective as". It suffixed -edd, which caused provection of a preceding voiced stop: palledd "as small as", swydiedd "as bright as", poledd "as thin as".
A few very common adjectives had irregular comparitive stems:
| Case | Masculine | Feminine | Neuter |
|---|---|---|---|
| Singular | |||
| Nom | ta cher | ti bawr | ta nhrasc |
| Gen | ta(s) gero | te(s) bery | taf drascu |
| Part | ta(s) chera | te(s) phore | taf thrasco |
| Dat | ta nghere | te mheri | taf nhrascwy |
| Plural | |||
| Nom | toe gerus | te beris | te thrascwys |
| Gen | tw ngheros | tw mhorys | te drascus |
| Part | toe ngheras | te mhores | tai drascos |
| Dat | toe(s) geradd | tai(s) bonedd | tai nhrascodd |
The three demonstratives "this", "that", and "yonder" were compounds of the ancestors of the Liotan demonstrative particles and the definite article. The stems were respectively enh- aeth- orth-; the masculine singular nominatives were thus enha-S aetha-S ortha-S, and the neuter genitive plural enhe-L aethe-L orthe-L.
Each pronoun inflected for nominative, genitive, and partitive cases, and had reduced forms which were used as object pronouns and after prepositions. Most reduced forms came in two forms, one for use after vowels and one for after consonants.
|   | Singular | Plural | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Person | Nom | Gen | Part | Reduced | Nom | Gen | Part | Reduced |
| 1 exc | rre | sa-N | saf | -(e)s | ges | goe-N | goe | -(y)g |
| 1 inc | --- | --- | --- | --- | der | der-N | der | -(y)dd |
| 2 | ffe | do-L | do | -(w)f | ffeth | ffw-N | ffaen | -(w)n |
| 3 masc | a | i-S | as | -a | ae | ae-N | aen | -ae |
| 3 fem | y | i-L | es | -y | ei | ei-N | ein | -ei |
| 3 neut | u | i-N | os | -u | wy | w-N | wyn | -wy |
| indef | ce | ca-N | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| refl | di | deg-L | deg | -(i)d | --- | --- | --- | --- |
The third person pronouns referred to a noun of the same gender; a dog was thus referred to as y "she". The neuter plural wy was used to refer to more than one noun of mixed genders.
The demonstrative pronouns were compounds of the stems enh- aeth- orth and the third person pronouns: enha "this one" (masculine singular), orthwy "those ones" (neuter plural).
The relative pronoun, which declined for case, gender, and number, was a compound of ia- and the definite article. In the nominative singular it was thus masculine and neuter iada and feminine iadi or iedi. The initial syllable was often dropped in speech.
Rest was indicated with the genitive case, the preposition nasalising the noun: ffu nghaddono "in a house", twd neny "beside the girl", ned lleuthu "under the roof".
Motion towards used the dative case; the preposition sometimes had a different form, often with suffixed -e, and lenited the noun. Thus ffwy gaddone "into a house", twde ddeni "to beside a girl", nede leuthwy "to under a roof".
Motion away from used the partitive case, sometimes with a different change in form, and also lenited the noun: ffwy gaddona "out of a house", twdd ddone "from next to a girl", ned leutho "from under a roof".
Among the commoner prepositions were the following:
| meaning | Towards | Rest | Away from |
|---|---|---|---|
| towards | rre | --- | --- |
| near, at, by | --- | bwys | --- |
| from, away from | --- | --- | med |
| outside, out of | dy | den | dy |
| inside, into | ffwy | ffu | ffwy |
| on, onto | ty | ty | ty |
| in front of | nyfe | nydd | nydd |
| behind | dure | dur | dur |
| above | caste | cast | cest |
| below | nede | ned | nyd |
| next to | twde | twd | twd |
| between | bydde | bydd | bydd |
The article combined with a preceding preposition, mutating appropriately: deda "out of the", denha "outside the", dyda "from outside the" (all masculine singular). The mutation after the article was nasalisation in the singular and lenition in the plural; thus ffwyda nghaddone "into the house". The final vowel of the compound was usually dropped in speech.
| Person | Auxiliary | "to be" |
|---|---|---|
| Singular | ||
| 1 | dwr-M | edr |
| 2 | duf-N | aif |
| 3 | du-N | ain |
| Plural | ||
| 1 exc | duae-S | esce |
| 1 inc | duedd-N | eidde |
| 2 | duen-L | eista |
| 3 | dues-L | eisa |
| Other | ||
| indef | dug-L | aig |
| rel | dwy-L | ede, de |
| Person | "hide" | "burn" | "carve" | "see" |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Singular | ||||
| 1 | boil-ar | yscar-er | tab-wr | toir-or |
| 2 | boil-af | yscar-if | tab-wf | toir-af |
| 3 | boil-a | yscar-e | tab-w | toir-e |
| Plural | ||||
| 1 exc | boil-ae | yscar-ai | tab-oe | toir-ae |
| 1 inc | boil-add | yscar-edd | tab-wdd | toir-edd |
| 2 | boil-an | yscar-en | tab-wn | toir-en |
| 3 | boil-as | yscar-es | tab-ws | toir-es |
| Other | ||||
| indef | boil-ag | yscar-eg | tab-wg | toir-ag |
| rel | boil-u (oe) | yscar-i | tab-wy | toir-i |
| Participles | ||||
| active | boil-ad | yscar-ed | tab-od | toir-th |
| stative | boil-es | yscar-is | tap-wys | toir-is |
The third person singular was used with a plural noun subject: casa te ddenis "the girls are singing", but casas "they are singing".
In more formal registers, fourth conjugation verbs raised the preceding vowel before the /i/ of the relative and lowered it before the 2 singular, 1 exc plural, and indefinite endings. The alternations were levelled out in more casual speech.
Another simple form was the future, which added the second conjugation endings to the future stem. This stem was usually characterised by /T/, sometimes /t/ or /d/: thus boilther "I will hide", yscarthe "it will burn", taethes "they will carve" (with loss of older /G/), toirthai "we will see". The future of "to be" had the stem eith-, thus eithe "it will be".
The historic past was formed by adding the personal endings to the past stem, which in simple verbs was most commonly derived from the present stem by ablaut: belar "I hid", yscere "it burned", tebws "they carved", terae "we saw". Some verbs had more divergent past stems; among the commonest were mefror "I give" -> maror "I gave", engor "I go" -> padar "I went", and palor "I do" -> telor "I did".
The past of the auxiliary was based on the stem pl- and was a second regular conjugation verb which caused the same mutations as in the present. The past stem of "to be" was einh-, which also took the second conjugation endings.
The conditional was a combination of the future endings and the past stem: belther "I would hide", yscerthe "it would burn", teithes "they would carve", terthai "we would see". The conditional of "to be" had the stem ythe-.
The other tense-aspect combinations were expressed with compounds. One of each is shown below; note the mutations of the initial consonant of the participle caused by auxiliary verb.
| Tense | "I hide" | "it burns" | "they carve" | "we see" | Formation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Present imperfect | dwr foilad | du yscared | dues dabed | duae thoirth | Auxiliary present + active |
| Present perfect | dwr foiles | du yscaris | dues dapwys | duae thoiris | Auxiliary present + stative |
| Past imperfect | pler foilad | ple yscared | plas dabed | plai thoirth | Auxiliary past + active |
| Past perfect | pler foiles | ple yscaris | plas dapwys | plai thoiris | Auxiliary past + stative |
| Simple past | edr boiles | ain yscaris | eisa tapwys | esce toiris | "to be" present + stative |
| Remote past | einher boiles | einhe yscaris | einhes tapwys | einhai toiris | "to be" past + stative |
The simple present of all conjugations was by adding /j/ to the present stem, raising the preceding vowel where appropriate, and the first conjugation endings. The past subjunctive was formed similarly from the past stem. For example:
The present subjunctive of the auxiliary was formed by replacing the /}/ with /j/, for example 2 singular dif and 2 plural dien; the first singular was dir and the relative dy, and the mutations were the same as in the indicative. The present subjunctive of "to be" was a regular formation on the stem tia-.
The second person singular imperative was the same as the presont subjunctive without the /j/ or the personal endings. The first and second person plural imperatives were formed by adding -idd and -in to this, with the appropriate vowel changes; thus the imperatives of the sample verbs were bwyl bwylidd bwylin, yscar ysceridd yscerin, taig teigidd teigin, twyr twyridd twyrin.
The conjugation of the substantive verb form was more regular than that of the coupla:
| Person | Present | Past |
|---|---|---|
| Singular | ||
| 1 | dawr | sair |
| 2 | dawf | saif |
| 3 | daw | sai |
| Plural | ||
| 1 exc | doe | siae |
| 1 inc | doedd | siedd |
| 2 | doen | sien |
| 3 | does | sies |
| Other | ||
| indef | dawg | saig |
| rel | dawi | sewi |
Unlike in Liotan, the substantive verb could be substituted for the copula with no change in syntax. The difference in meaning was one of permanence; thus daw ddawn y implied that she was or would be something else, emphasising the temporary nature of this fact. Similarly, daw rast y "she is tall" implied that she was also capable of being short.
The future and subjunctive stems of the substantive verb were dod- and deia-.
The negative of the copula simply prefixed ll-, thus lledr, llaif, llain in the present singular and past stem lleinh-. The negative of the substantive verb replaced the initial /d/ or /g/ with /L/, thus first person singular llawr and llir.
The interrogative prefixed ffi-N: ffi-moilar "am I hiding?", ffinwr foilad "do I hide?". There was no negative interrogative.
The adverbs of place were compounds of the demonstrative stems enh- aeth- orth and the neuter singular nominal case endings: enhu "here", aetho "from there", orthwy "to yonder".
|   | Unit | + 10 | x 20 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | mel-M | cynefel | cer |
| 2 | sen-L | cynehen | sencher |
| 3 | sel-L | cynehel | selcher |
| 4 | rryng-N | cyneryng | rryngher |
| 5 | der-N | cynedder | derger |
| 6 | non-N | cyneson | nongher |
| 7 | llung-N | cynelung | llungher |
| 8 | por-S | cynebor | porcher |
| 9 | swyth-S | cynewyth | swycher |
| 10 | cwyn | cynegwyn | cwyngher |
The absence of the article indicated "one" adequately, and mel by itself thus meant "only one": mel chawr "only one boy", but cawr "boy, a boy".
The cardinal numbers up to 19 were followed by the partitive plural of the noun: sel galles "three dogs", por dones "eight girls". Note also sel tai galles "three of the dogs", with the article, implying that there were more.
"11" to "19" were compounds of cyn, de "and", and the lenited unit. The medial /e/ was often dropped in casual speech, thus cynhel "13", cyndder "15", and so on.
cer "20" and its compounds were nouns which required the partitive singular: cer girwa "20 sticks", selcher gwyse "60 knives". Intermediate quantities placed the excess over the multiple of 20 after the noun, as with llwngher lleutho cynedder "155 roofs" (literally "seven score roofs and fifteen").
The ordinals had the same form as the cardinals, except ffur "first" and som(h) "second". All of them preceded the nominative singular of the noun, which did not take the article, and triggered spirant mutation: ffur chall "the first dog", por dawn "the eighth girl".
-eg (feminine) was a diminutive: calleg "little dog", gwyseg "dagger" ("little knife", also gwysieg). This suffix found its way into Dekavurian as a feminine naming suffix.
Abstract nominal suffixes included -ast (neuter), -af and -an(h) (both masculine): swydiast "brightness", polaf "smallness", myddian "quiet".
Nominae agentis were formed with -ed, feminine -eidi: tabed "carver (male)", caseidi "singer (female)".
Neuter deverbal nouns denoting the results of actions were mostly formed with -ed, such as ffwysced "a jump", or -ob, as in palob "a deed".
-ag formed things and tools, which were neuter: moddag "spade" (moddar "I dig"), dostag "hammer, club" (dostar "I hit, I strike").
-udd with provection, derived from tuddor "to cause", was the equivalent of "-able": etudd "flexible" (related to oidar "I bend").
-os- with provection formed fourth conjugation inceptives and causatives: myddi "quiet" -> myddiosor "I fall silent", oid "bent, curved" -> oitosor "I bend". The past tenses of these verbs had -us-, thus myddusor "I fell silent", and the subjunctives had -osia- and -usia-.
-af- was the equivalent of Liotan -abhach, and -ol- was its opposite. Both of these formed first conjugation verbs: sawd "blood" -> sodafar "I bleed", cenolar "I remove water from".
Pronominal objects were suffixed to the verb: toiror-w "I see you", eisa-u tabws "they carved it".
The nominative and partitive cases could both be used as the subject and object of the verb; the nominative referred to the entirety of the noun or nouns, the partitive to only part. Thus "I am drinking some water" would naturally be translated rrodar cena, with a partitive object; the use of the nominative in rrodar cen would imply that all of the water was being drunk. Similarly, compare casas te ddenis "the girls are singing" with casas te nones "some of the girls are singing".
The partitive was also used after nouns of quantity: cawdd girwadd "some sticks", ffustw cena "a lot of water".
The genitive indicated that one noun depended on another. The article was not used with the independent noun: ffur ceilly "a dog's head", ffur te geilly "the dog's head".
The dative, when not otherwise qualified with a preposition, was the case of the indirect object: mefror tyli te ngheilli "I give a bone to the dog". It was used after certain verbs such as "say", "tell", "order", and so on.
The future tense described actions not yet begun in the present, and the conditional actions not yet begun in the past: rrother "I will drink", rrwther "I would drink".
The two imperfect tenses referred to actions which were happening in the background, uncompleted, or habitual: dwr rodad "I drink, am drinking, tend to drink", dwr rodes "I was drinking, used to drink, tended to drink". Their perfect counterparts described actions the fact of whose completion was in some way important: pler rodad "I have drunk", pler rodes "I drank, had drunk".
The remote past was a kind of pluperfect: einher rrodes "I drank, had drunk".
If the subordinate verb referred to an action which was being or had been realised, the appropriate participle was used with the genitive of its subject:
Some types of subordinate clause could also be expressed by a combination of a preposition and the subjunctive mood, for example:
However, temporal subordinate clauses were more usually expressed with the particples:
V1 S1; V2 S1 >> V2 S1 V1(rel)
casa to
ddawn; daw rast ti ddawn >> daw rast ti ddawn gasu
"the girl sings; the girl is tall" >> "the girl who is singing is
tall"
V1 S1 O1; V2 S2 (S2 = O1) >> V2 S2 V1(rel) S1
rel-pron
fonhu ti gall ta chois; daw loir ta chois
>> daw loir ta chois fonha ti gall iada
"the dog is
eating the fish; the fish is white" >> "the fish which the dog is
eating is white"
The same construction, with the copula ain, was used for emphasis:
V1 S1 >> du S1 V1(rel)
casa ti ddawn
>> ain ti ddawn gasu
"the girl is singing" >> "it
is the girl who is singing"
V1 S1 O1 >> ain S1 V1(rel) O1
fonhu ti
gall ta chois >> ain ti gall fonhu ta chois
"the
dog is eating the fish" >> "it is the dog who is eating the
fish"
V1 S1 O1 >> ain O1 V1 S1 rel-pron
fonhu
ti gall ta chois >> ain ta chois fonha ti gall iada
"the dog is eating the fish" >> "it is the fish which the dog is
eating"