Nobody expects watertight logic from a
feelgood musical, but surely a wisp or two of basic sense isn’t too
much to ask. It is, alas, from this version of the 1992 movie that
starred Whoopi Goldberg. As in the film, nightclub singer Deloris Van
Cartier sees her mobster boyfriend murder a man and gets placed in
witness protection in a convent, where she transforms the dull,
tuneless choir into a soul/gospel powerhouse. Question 1: did it not
strike anyone at any point that a choir who can’t sing do not make a
natural subject for a musical? Most of the first act at least will have
to be either tuneless or nonsensical. Writers Cheri and Bill
Steinkellner take the nonsense option, with the nuns getting a big,
complex jubilee number before the first choir practice at which their
lack of fizz is supposedly revealed.
But Deloris, alias Sister Mary Clarence, shows the choir how to connect
with the soul in soul music. Question 2: did anyone stop to ask whether
this central metaphor – finding the spirit as well as the human passion
in soul – would still work when expressed in terms of an original score
rather than the soul standards used in the film? Here the nuns do not
simply commandeer classic numbers, but find themselves making up
complex new songs in an idiom supposedly utterly alien to them. Oh, but
it’s a musical, it doesn’t have to make sense. But yes, it does, some
at least. Next to great holes like this, it becomes hairsplitting to
note that a story now set in 1978 Philadelphia is scored by Alan Menken
predominantly in the Motown style of soul rather than the creamier
Philly sound, or that one aged sister hits upon rap over a year before
the Sugarhill Gang. Either none of these things occurred to the
creative team or they didn’t think it mattered; in other words, they
reckoned that even “premium” ticket prices of £85 plus booking
fees do not buy ordinary, everyday coherence.
It’s not a brainless show; Glenn Slater’s lyrics are often enjoyably
sharp. It’s just that whenever the choice arises between creative and
commercial smarts, commercial wins out every time. Director Peter
Schneider spent 17 years as president of feature animation at the Walt
Disney Studios, and correspondingly does his best to remove any third
dimension from the performances of his cast. (Only the redoubtable
Sheila Hancock in the role of the Mother Superior resists.) Gangster
Shank and his minions get the kind of blaxploitation-style scenes that
can be successfully ironised on celluloid but are much dodgier in the
flesh. Overall, what had been an unlikely yarn onscreen becomes a
cheesy fantasia onstage.
Patina Miller as Deloris has a strong voice which largely avoids
currently fashionable Macy Grayisms and exits through the mouth rather
than the nose, and is ably supported by the occupants of the various
sidekick roles (shy nun, tubby nun, old nun). But the closing number,
when Deloris and the Mother Superior come together in a cloudily godly
yet also respectably humanistic agreement that what really matters is
Love, is one more subsidence in a show whose structure collapses under
the scrutiny even of a moderately curious nine-year-old. Oh, but it’s
only a bit of fun, after all. Indeed, that’s all it is, at best. Are we
really worth no more than this?
Written for the Financial
Times.