It is something of a surprise to see
Terence Rattigan’s
The Browning
Version presented with one of Chekhov’s comic shorts as a
curtain-raiser. But both the Rattigan and
Swansong are about practitioners at
the end of undistinguished careers – a schoolmaster and an actor
respectively – momentarily reconnecting with works that had first fired
them up.. and in both cases Aeschylus’
Agamemnon figures largely. Peter
Bowles gives a brace of assured central performances. He shows more
relish in the role of Chekhov’s Svetlovidov than might have been
expected, following his own well-publicised bout of line amnesia
onstage a couple of years ago.
Whatever its thematic links,
Swansong
is little more than fluff (Chekhov claimed to have written it in an
hour), but it lulls us into a false sense that similarly little will be
at stake in the Rattigan piece. In this, Bowles astutely shows that
protagonist Crocker-Harris is not entirely dead inside yet. Several
moments in his performance can best, if bizarrely, be described as
“desiccated twinkling”. James Musgrave is appealing as the tactlessly
brash classics student who reawakens the “Crock”’s sense of his own
human decency, and Candida Gubbins deepens from mimsy beginnings to a
portrayal of smiling villainy as the contemptuous, adulterous Mrs
Crocker-Harris.
The Browning Version, loosely
inspired by Rattigan’s own time at Harrow School, comes almost from
another world in both its old-fashioned craft and its sentiment, yet
characteristically of the playwright it proves surprisingly effective
(and affecting) still. Conversely, one of the other presentations in
the first tranche of this year’s seventh Peter Hall Company season in
Bath seems in many ways a satirical-political prophecy. Bernard Shaw’s
The Apple Cart (1928) concerns
British royalty taking political views in public, a monarch with a
mistress, an abdication crisis and a massive knot of who-rules-Britain
debate: crown, cabinet, media, Big Business or America? A mordant
topicality accrues even to throwaway one-liners such as “I had rather
be a dog than Prime Minister of a country in which the only thing the
people can be serious about is football and refreshments” and “God help
England if she had no Scots to think for her!”… both uttered by a
self-regarding Scottish P.M., nudge-nudge. Shaw deliberately mixes
matters up by giving his then-contemporary characters classical names
to dissociate them from specific figures (as if that would have fooled
anyone), and Hall and designer Christopher Woods underline this
then-and-now ambiguity by deploying amid the formal palace décor
a number of chrome-and-glass furnishings.
Charles Edwards is at once amiable and wily (he brought a similar
combination to the West End’s four-handed adaptation of
The 39 Steps) as King Magnus,
offered an ultimatum by his Labour cabinet to stop leaking his views to
the press or face the mass resignation of the government and an
election fought on the constitutionality of the monarchy. One feels
that Prince Charles has read this play and attempted a Magnus-like
stratagem or two in his time, but without the same disarming air of
insouciance. The cabinet themselves are muddled and bickering, from
Penny Bunton’s glacial Powermistress General to Barry Stanton’s
prolier-than-thou President of the Board of Trade, with James
Laurenson’s Prime Minister relying on bluster and high dudgeon to keep
them in check. Meanwhile, the King’s mistress is eager to take the
place of his wife, and to top it all the United States want to perform
a reverse-takeover of the British Empire by rejoining it.
As usual with Shaw, there are at least two major ideas too many
jostling for space (and less space than usual, at that: barely two
hours of playing time). However, the speechifying of his characters is
not nearly so relentless as it often is. Indeed, perhaps the highlight
of the play is the verbal fencing between Edwards and Janie Dee as his
mistress, a typical Shavian intellectual duel but invested by the
actors with playfulness and affection. Dee, who appears only in this
one scene in the entire season, nevertheless shines as delightfully as
ever: when she remarks, “I am one of Nature's queens, and they know
it,” an entire audience nods inwardly.
David Storey’s
Home is often
considered to be an only slightly covert state-of-the-nation play, in
which two elderly patrician gentlemen meet up with a couple of
working-class women in the grounds of an industrial-scale mental
institution. Class differences in personal and social contexts, and a
sympathy for individual lacks and yearnings, have all been discerned in
Storey’s play, but not, alas, by me. I can see little of either social
or emotional depth in it. Stephen Unwin directs a prime cast: David
Calder, Lesley Joseph, Nichola McAuliffe and Stephen Moore are all on
form, give or take a too-hefty Cockney accent. But it is one more of
the surprises offered by this batch of plays that
Home turns out to be the most
innocuous of the lot.
Written for the Financial
Times.