A FLEA IN HER EAR
The Old Vic, London
SE1
Opened 14 December, 2010
***
The Hôtel Coq d’Or possesses the two elements crucial to classic
farce: plenty of doors and almost as many... ahem. It may, in Rob
Howell’s design, be so bedecked with gilt swirls that it looks like an
attack of the Art Nouveau collywobbles, but the events on its premises
in the second act of Feydeau’s 1907 play (originally La puce à l’oreille) run
like a beautiful Heath Robinson machine, at once unwieldy and elegant.
Both the play and Richard Eyre’s production are beautifully
constructed, yet this outing somehow fails to strike the note of
mischievous delight that is what keeps the genre so perennially popular.
No single ingredient seems deficient. In Tom Hollander, Eyre has a
skilled protagonist... or rather, pair of protagonists, since the plot
depends on the astounding resemblance between insurance broker Monsieur
Chandebise and Poche, an alcoholic porter at the aforementioned hotel,
which is notorious as a venue for adulterous trysts and at which all
the characters arrive in various permutations and for an assortment of
motives. Hollander heads a phalanx of acting talent including Lisa
Dillon as his naïve wife, Lloyd Hutchinson as the former sergeant
major who runs the hotel, Jonathan Cake as the libidinous friend drawn
by mistake into the bed-hopping but a gleeful participant, and Oliver
Cotton as the doctor who tries to sedate Poche in the third act when it
seems that “Chandebise” has lost his mind. It contains a brace of comic
speech impediments: nephew Camille’s cleft palate is included in the
script, jealous Carlos’s paella-thick Spanish accent is simply thrown
in for good measure (the first time I have seen John Marquez parody his
ethnic heritage so broadly). There is also a generous dose of le vice anglais, with a veritable
tattoo being played out on numerous backsides.
The cast all follow the golden rule of taking the ridiculous goings-on
with utmost seriousness: we need to feel that much is at stake for the
farce to work. It is not that they stifle the comedy – as I say, the
construction and execution are marvellous – but my machine analogy is
telling. The production moves admirably, but in a mechanical way, never
achieving the balletic grace that gives such shenanigans the spark of
life.