Catherine Trieschmann’s play is in effect an evolutionist/creationist version of David Mamet’s
Oleanna.
Instead of a liberal arts professor accused by a female student of
sexual assault, the central character is a high-school science teacher
recently arrived from New York to a small town in Kansas decimated by a
tornado, who in class makes offhand use of the term “gobbledegook”,
only to find an intense, withdrawn student first querying it and then
interpreting it as an insult to his and most of the town’s faith.
Trieschmann
seems aware of her Mametian template throughout, even when she chooses
to diverge from it. For instance, in order to show that this is a more
complex issue than the excessive application of doctrines of political
correctness, she does not restrict herself to two onstage characters.
No, she uses
three. The third is young Micah’s
de facto
guardian, who shares his creationist views and proves a more subtle
interlocutor but is also finally more prepared to come to an
accommodation. It doesn’t happen, of course: as in the Mamet, there is
no compromise, although here, rather than capitulate, teacher Susan
resigns. And, as in so many argument plays, the accuser makes up in
quiet fervour what they lack in articulacy whilst the accused trips
over the bulk of their own knowledge and torpedoes themselves with
occasional indiscretions and uncontrolled outbursts.
It
takes some doing to fit a full-ceilinged set into the Arcola’s smaller
studio space. This canopy serves between scenes as an overhead screen
on which is projected the creation of the cosmos, and during the action
as the roof of the prefabricated classroom. Des Kennedy’s direction is
as quiet as Perry Millward’s Micah: Kennedy seems at first to be
favouring naturalism over pace, but is simply allowing a slow build
between Millward, Anna Francolini’s New Yorkily brisk Susan and Ciaran
McIntyre’s laid-back, occasionally Mephistophelean and (oddly) just a
tiny bit camp Gene. Ultimately, though, one always knows where
Trieschmann’s sympathies lie; she is too programmatic in her attempts
to make it an equal struggle, and too ready to deploy personal
cod-psychology to explain (to explain away?) Micah’s attitude at the
end. The play’s position, as in the final big-crunch projection,
returns to a singularity as if the preceding 100 minutes had never
taken place.
Written for the Financial
Times.