Of
equal dramatic importance to the eponymous monarch in this lesser-known
history play is the character named Philip Faulconbridge but known for
the most part simply as the Bastard; early in the play he is
acknowledged as the natural son of Richard the Lionheart and thus
John’s nephew, and he is the only sympathetic bastard in all of
Shakespeare. In this production he is also female. I had expected to
find this irksomely at odds with the world of the play, but in Maria
Aberg’s production it is not. Aberg sets the action in an unspecific
late-20th-century retro environment. King John wears a service
greatcoat and biker boots; the King of France is resplendent in a
powder-blue polyester safari suit. When these opponents are reconciled
by a dynastic marriage, the two courts cut loose to “Say A Little
Prayer” and “I’ve Had The Time Of My Life”.
This may, and in my view does, create more and bigger problems than it
solves. There are conceptually clever touches such as flooding the
stage with balloons and confetti after the interval (a notice as we
enter wryly warns “This production contains loud noises, smoke effects
and latex balloons”), suggesting the mess after the party that needs to
be cleaned up, i.e. an England in chaos following John’s dispute with
the Pope. (The papal legate Pandulph is also female, though I defy
anyone to question the propriety of the wonderful Paola Dionisotti.)
However, the overall effect is to trivialise the entire story. Since
this is already uncertain in tone – John is neither a good nor a bad
king, nor is he brought down by a single tragic flaw – Aberg’s staging
exacerbates the uncertainty when what it needs is clarification.
Alex Waldmann (who is finally getting the chance to give weighty
performances after too long an apprenticeship) and Pippa Nixon bring a
sexual charge to the relationship between the king and the Bastard; in
one scene they give off a distinctly Macbethian vibe, leading me to
wonder whether I would not have preferred to see them play that couple
rather than this factitious one. It is a decade since the last
King John, so one cannot, if
interested, afford to pass up an opportunity to see the play; this,
though, is a production that begs the questions it poses rather than
tackling them.
Written for the Financial
Times.