A CHORUS OF DISAPPROVAL
 
Harold Pinter Theatre, London SW1
Opened 27 September, 2012
***

The casting of this revival of Alan Ayckbourn’s 1984 comedy furnishes a clutch of in-jokes for the theatre cognoscenti. When widower Guy Jones joins the local am-dram production of The Beggar’s Opera, he is advised, “Use your natural accent; it’s what I do” by old stager Jarvis Huntley-Pike… played by Barrie Rutter, the founding director of Northern Broadsides, a company which exists to play the classics in a Yorkshire accent. Later, when Jones is having a fraught conversation with his lover… one of his lovers… during a technical rehearsal, as the pair are followed around the stage by bad lighting states, the voice of the director is heard decrying one such by saying “He’d have to be a midget” to be lit properly by it; Nigel Harman, who plays Jones, was last seen in the West End shuffling around on his knees as villainous shorthouse Lord Farquaad in Shrek – The Musical. Even musical director Mr Ames is played by that titan of the orchestra pit Steven Edis.
    
But how compelling its appeal may prove beyond such initiates is moot. The world outwith the Pendon Amateur Light Operatic Society is once again familiar 28 years on, with its insider deals, clandestine payoffs and business closures. Ayckbourn skilfully interweaves Guy’s rise and fall both in the company and specifically amongst its female contingent with extracts from John Gay’s original work. Above all, the role of (onstage) director Dafydd ap Llewellyn is a fine fit with Rob Brydon’s natural performance persona as an affable, unspectacular Welsh chap who periodically makes ill-judged remarks.
    
However, unspectacular-ness is at the core of the play. Protagonist Guy is one of those Ayckbourn linchpins who are not doers themselves, but quiet, self-effacing types to whom things ineluctably happen. (Offstage) director Trevor Nunn is, as ever, skilled at unfolding events at more or less their natural pace; it’s just that in this case, that isn’t a particularly dramatic one. We sympathise with Guy and smile at his encounters, but feel nothing keener about him, any of his fellows or the society in which they all move. It is this keenness that makes Ayckbourn so much more than the boulevardier of popular myth, such that there is no disjunction between his name and that of the playwright which now adorns this theatre. Alas, it is here largely absent along with any sense of urgency.
     
Written for the Financial Times.

Copyright © Ian Shuttleworth; all rights reserved.

Return to index of reviews for the year 2012

Return to master reviews index

Return to main theatre page

Return to Shutters homepage