I wish I had not seen this production on
its press night, amidst an audience of Royal Court habitués and folk in
the trade. With a house full of the people for whom the Theatre Local
project is intended, I think – I fear – it may have a very different
reception.
Previous Theatre Local enterprises staged debbie tucker green’s
random about knife crime in the
Elephant & Castle Shopping Centre and Rachel De-lahay’s
The Westbridge about general urban
tension in the Bussey Building in Peckham. Now, in the most
neighbourhood setting yet, the Rose Lipman Community Centre on the
largely high-rise De Beauvoir Estate in Haggerston, north-east London,
the choice of flagship production is Annie Baker’s play about an
evening drama class in the small fictional town of Shirley, Vermont,
hardly a haven for the brothers. Really, did someone just think “Oh,
it’s set in a community centre”, as if all such centres were alike? In
any case, the configuration of the space is the least site-responsive
and most conventional-theatre of any Local site so far: the end-on
seating itself comes straight from the Court’s Upstairs space.
Don’t get me wrong. James Macdonald’s production is a fine one, with
the cast every bit as good as one would expect of Toby Jones, Imelda
Staunton, Shannon Tarbet, Danny Webb and Fenella Woolgar. They all
expertly pace and pitch our fleeting glimpses of human beings in the
cracks between the vapid, artsy-fartsy creative games (nothing as
off-putting in these classes as working on an actual play, dear me,
no). As often as not a simple look or a mere pause in the final second
before a scene-changing blackout shows us what we need to know about
this too-smiling teacher (Staunton) and the four students including her
husband (Webb). There is moderate poignancy, and rather more humour.
But I became more and more aware that the laughter I was hearing was
that of familiarity, of people in the professional know chuckling
comfortably and a little condescendingly. How would this play to an
audience of those on the building’s doorstep? Would the laughter be
comradely or derisive as at an entirely different species? Would it be
sufficiently, or at all, tempered by the compassionate insights
presented as well? I don’t for an instant doubt such an audience’s
capacity to understand the play; what I doubt is whether it would offer
them anything much to bother understanding.
Written for the Financial
Times.