Salomes
aren’t being thinly sliced these days; there’s no shortage of them on
major stages. Yael Farber’s new version of the para-biblical tale
opened at the National Theatre barely a month ago, and now the Royal
Shakespeare Company in Stratford revive Oscar Wilde’s drama (1891;
English translation, 1894). Salome, infatuated but spurned by Iokanaan
(John the Baptist), exploits the drunken offers of her inappropriately
fixated stepfather and uncle, Herod Antipas, to give her any gift if
she will dance for him, by demanding Iokanaan’s head.
Wilde’s writing, like Farber’s more politically inclined version, is
florid and overblown, as a matter of deliberate choice. The role of the
viewer is to decide whether this is the
right choice; that of the
theatre-makers, to persuade us that it is. It is almost a textbook
example of the Queer theatrical aesthetic: flamboyant, at times
bathetic but always defiant in its presentation of the gay dimension as
deservedly crucial. Yet this particular work is so Queer that it serves
as an acid test of such an approach. The humour of ridiculousness is
frequent but, I fear, hardly ever intentional; the dialogue, ritually
repetitious; the sexuality somehow more explicit for being embodied
principally in the symbolic form of Salome’s dance.
Director Owen Horsley takes matters even further by casting a male
actor, Matthew Tennyson, as Salome, thus making every aspect of the
dynamic gay, and by punctuating the proceedings with anthemic (and also
defiantly gay) musical numbers composed by Perfume Genius and sung by
Ilan Evans costumed as a fetish queen. It’s relentless. And, despite
the efforts of Tennyson, Matthew Pidgeon as Herod and Suzanne Burden as
his wife Herodias, it doesn’t overcome regular Wildean plonking of the
worst kind. I’m afraid I kept mentally composing parodies. This is a
bold attempt to face up to the challenges of Wilde’s material and to
carry it even further; however, it doesn’t make its case persuasively,
and so the final verdict as to whether or not it is – frankly –
bearable is a matter of personal taste. I don’t regret seeing it, but I
wouldn’t go back.
Written for the Financial
Times.