The latest new piece to be presented in
the Royal Shakespeare Company’s reactivated Other Place falls into the
category of “honourable failure”. It’s unfortunate that this way of
looking at work has gone out of fashion, although in the current case
I’m slightly mystified as to why the attempt was made in the first
place. It’s absurd to consider anything to be the last word on a given
subject; however, as regards dramatic treatments of the historical
moment of uncertainty and potential for radical ideas in England
immediately after the Civil War of the 1640s, following Caryl
Churchill’s
Light Shining In
Buckinghamshire (revived a couple of years ago at the National
Theatre), Gemma Brockis and Wendy Hubbard here are effectively trying
to reinvent the wheel.
Brockis, Hubbard and their half-dozen actors and co-devisers begin
earlier than Churchill, with a reimagining of the final masque to be
performed at the court of King Charles I. They treat its disintegration
as kind of lead-in to the Civil War... which is, itself, squandered as
a series of captions projected on to the stage. This production’s claim
to originality is its promenade component; after the first half-hour we
are walked into the venue’s scene dock for the king’s execution and a
collage of “world turned upside down” scenes featuring the likes of a
Leveller preacher (Lucy Ellinson briefly avoiding grievous underuse
throughout the rest of the evening); however, the principal motivator
is surely ordering us out of the theatre as an analogue of, well, the
Puritan closure of the theatres.
As anachronistically as that ban appeared, we return to the theatre for
the third and final phase, in which occasional scenes emerge from a
series of to-me-inexplicable tableaux, and the tension between flux and
mutability on the one hand, and increasing Puritan authoritarianism on
the other, seems to be emblematised in the juxtaposition of a group of
underground actors and the preparations for Cromwell’s butchering Irish
expedition. In the end, the piece suffers from the besetting affliction
of so much devised work: it begins with a nebulous vapour of ideas
and/or images it would like to develop, but ends up simply enacting the
nebula rather than coalescing it into theatrical matter.
Written for the Financial
Times.