THE TELL-TALE HEART
National Theatre (Dorfman), London SE1
The spine of the Poe tale remains intact: narrator, driven insane by
housemate’s glittering eye, murders and dismembers said housemate, but the
victim’s heart refuses to be still. Here, though, the two central characters
are women: a playwright on retreat in an attic flat in Brighton and her
landlady. Probably. Most of the time. Facts begin to shift: the investigating
detective morphs between camp and ineffectual to flinty and inexorable... even
his hairline changes, as do the accused’s name, from Celeste to Camille, and
the lighting states: the tough guy always appears with house lights on. We
begin to wonder whether one of these strands is Celeste (for the sake of
argument)’s fiction, but which one, and how much of what we see is neither real
nor fictional but her increasing delusion, or what? It’s a puzzle, in short.
As ever, Neilson leavens the action with pitch-black humour. On this
occasion, though, there are also a plethora of conceptual puns which remain
unspelt-out but simply lurk there. Landlady Nora sports a huge, bulbous eyeball
like a boiled egg; Celeste also has an aversion to egg... or, in German, Ei. The first scene in Brighton shows (though
discreetly) Celeste on the loo... or on the po/Poe. The sharp-eyed will also
have spotted that, in an apparent prologue, the theatrical award which Celeste
wins but refuses is heart-shaped. Compared to these arcane gags, matters like Celeste
labouring under a deadline for the National Theatre or the detective offering a
verdict on the current lauded West End production of Company (“Meh”) are chicken-feed.
Tamara Lawrance rides the increasingly surreal rollercoaster of events
dextrously as Celeste, somehow committing to the moment yet also finding a
through-line for her character(s). Imogen Doel’s always engaging acting talent
seems undiminished by having half a ping-pong ball glued to her face, and
certainly not affected by a little thing like Nora’s murder. David Carlyle is a
little too mincing as one version of the detective but daunting as the other.
Neilson the director enjoys making full use of the resources of his
commissioning venues to realise Neilson the writer’s bizarre vision: here the
supernatural and the psychedelic each come into play, and even someone as
blithe about spoilers as I am would hesitate before revealing the most (not quite literally) eye-popping effect. If the
show doesn’t seem to have any decipherable hinterland, at least the land itself
affords an exhilarating hike.
Copyright © Ian Shuttleworth; all rights reserved.
Return to index of reviews for the year 2018